Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 19;15(16):2076.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15162076.

Global Longitudinal Strain in Stress Echocardiography: A Review of Its Diagnostic and Prognostic Role in Noninvasive Cardiac Assessment

Affiliations
Review

Global Longitudinal Strain in Stress Echocardiography: A Review of Its Diagnostic and Prognostic Role in Noninvasive Cardiac Assessment

Nikolaos Antoniou et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The integration of global longitudinal strain (GLS) with stress echocardiography (SE) represents a significant advancement in non-invasive cardiac diagnostics, particularly in the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). GLS, derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography, quantifies myocardial deformation and offers superior sensitivity for detecting subclinical myocardial dysfunction compared to conventional metrics like wall motion and ejection fraction. Recent studies have validated the prognostic and diagnostic efficacy of GLS both at rest and during stress, notably enhancing the detection of obstructive and non-obstructive CAD, microvascular dysfunction, and other cardiac pathologies. Methods: This manuscript synthesizes extensive clinical data demonstrating the added value of GLS during stress echocardiography across diverse cardiac conditions-including valvular heart disease, heart failure, cardio-oncology, and pediatric cardiology. Novel metrics like longitudinal strain reserve (LSR), myocardial work indices, and post-systolic strain have further enriched risk stratification strategies. Results: The combination of GLS with SE has been shown to approximate the accuracy of invasive coronary angiography in intermediate-risk patients and in cases with equivocal traditional SE findings. Despite its clinical promise, the utility of GLS is challenged by technical limitations, including image quality dependency, inter-vendor variability, and limited applicability during high heart rate states. Conclusions: As technological refinement and standardization progress, GLS integrated with SE is poised to become a mainstay in precision cardiology, improving diagnostic yield, guiding therapeutic decisions, and enhancing patient outcomes.

Keywords: coronary artery disease (CAD); global longitudinal strain (GLS); longitudinal strain reserve (LSR); myocardial deformation; myocardial work; non-invasive cardiac imaging; risk stratification; speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE); stress echocardiography (SE); subclinical dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Global longitudinal strain (GLS) in normal left ventricular systolic function. Speckle-tracking echocardiography from apical views shows uniform strain curves with preserved segmental deformation. The bull’s-eye plot demonstrates normal GLS (−19.1%) and ejection fraction (52%).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Global longitudinal strain (GLS) analysis in a patient with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Speckle-tracking echocardiography from apical views shows markedly reduced strain in most myocardial segments. The bull’s-eye plot highlights global impairment (GLS –5.6%, normal ≤ –18%), with predominant septal and inferior segment involvement. Calculated EF is 20%, consistent with advanced systolic failure.

Similar articles

References

    1. Woodward W., Dockerill C., McCourt A., Upton R., O’DRiscoll J., Balkhausen K., Chandrasekaran B., Firoozan S., Kardos A., Wong K., et al. Real-world performance and accuracy of stress echocardiography: The EVAREST observational multi-centre study. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2022;23:689–698. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab092. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sicari R., Nihoyannopoulos P., Evangelista A., Kasprzak J., Lancellotti P., Poldermans D., Voigt J.-U., Zamorano J.L., European Association of Echocardiography Stress Echocardiography Expert Consensus Statement—Executive Summary: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC) Eur. Heart J. 2009;30:278–289. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoffmann R., Lethen H., Marwick T., Arnese M., Fioretti P., Pingitore A., Picano E., Buck T., Erbel R., Flachskampf F.A., et al. Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1996;27:330–336. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00483-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saraste M., Knuuti J., Saraste A. Two-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking during Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in the Detection of Myocardial Ischemia in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2016;29:470–479.e3. - PubMed
    1. Nagy A.I., Sahlén A., Manouras A., Henareh L., da Silva C., Günyeli E., Apor A.A., Merkely B., Winter R. Combination of contrast-enhanced wall motion analysis and myocardial deformation imaging during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2015;16:88–95. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu171. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources