The Effect of Nutrition Impact Symptoms on Nutrition Status After Completion of Curative-Intent Treatment for Gastric, Oesophageal, and Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Gastric, oesophageal, and pancreatic cancers are common worldwide, with low but improving survival rates due to advances in curative treatments. However, these treatments often cause long-term nutrition impact symptoms that are frequently overlooked, leading to malnutrition and poorer health outcomes. This review explored the types of nutrition impact symptoms following curative-intent treatment for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers and assessed their impact on nutrition status. Methods: A systematic search of four electronic databases identified studies involving adults treated with curative intent for UGI cancers. Included studies reported both nutrition impact symptoms and nutrition outcomes using validated tools. Study quality was assessed, and results were synthesised narratively. Results: Eleven studies (n = 953 participants), predominantly from the Asia-Pacific region, met the inclusion criteria. Participants were mostly male (68%), with surgery as the primary treatment (91%). Most studies (n = 10) used validated assessment tools to identify nutrition impact symptoms. Reflux was the most commonly reported symptom (n = eight studies), followed by abdominal pain and diarrhoea. Nutrition status was assessed using various validated tools: Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (n = six studies, 55%), Mini Nutritional Assessment (n = two studies, 18%), and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition as well as Subjective Global Assessment and Prognostic Nutritional Index (both n = one study, 9%). Malnutrition prevalence was up to 87% one year post-treatment. Conclusions: Nutrition impact symptoms are common and persistent after curative-intent treatment for UGI cancers. Future research should incorporate validated assessment tools and extend follow-up beyond 12 months. Integrating long-term, tailored dietetic support to identify and manage symptoms post-treatment is vital to improve outcomes for patients.

Keywords: gastric cancer; nutrition impact symptoms; nutrition outcomes; oesophageal cancer; pancreatic cancer; post-treatment; upper gastrointestinal cancers.

Figure 1

PRISMA Flow Diagram.

Figure 2

Quality and Risk of Bias using Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Checklist for Primary Research [34,35,36,37,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. ‘+’ indicates yes for the question, ‘−‘ indicates no and ‘?’ indicates unclear.