Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 18;14(16):2568.
doi: 10.3390/plants14162568.

Drought Resistance Evaluation of Camellia oleifera var. "Xianglin 210" Grafted onto Different Rootstocks

Zhilong He  1   2   3   4 , Ying Zhang  1   2   3   4 , Chengfeng Xun  1   2   3   4 , Dayu Yang  1   2   3   4 , Zhen Zhang  1   2   3   4 , Yushen Ma  1   2   3   4 , Xin Wei  5 , Zhentao Wan  5 , Xiangnan Wang  1   2   3   4 , Yufeng Zhang  1   2   3   4 , Yongzhong Chen  1   2   3   4 , Rui Wang  1   2   3   4
Affiliations

Drought Resistance Evaluation of Camellia oleifera var. "Xianglin 210" Grafted onto Different Rootstocks

Zhilong He et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

As a key economic tree in southern China, Camellia oleifera faces severe yield losses under drought. Grafting onto drought-tolerant rootstocks offers a potential mitigation strategy. To elucidate the impact of rootstocks on the drought resistance of the superior Camellia oleifera Abel. cultivar "Xianglin 210", grafted seedlings with five scion-rootstock combinations, were subjected to gradient drought stress. Key physiological and biochemical indices related to photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes, and osmotic adjustment were measured. Drought resistance was comprehensively evaluated using membership function analysis, and the expression of stress-responsive genes was quantified via quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The results demonstrated that under drought stress, (1) stomatal conductance (Gs) decreased by 31.2-48.7%, while instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) increased by 18.5-35.4%; (2) proline (Pro) and soluble sugars (SS) accumulated significantly, with increases of 2.3-4.1-fold and 1.8-3.2-fold, respectively; (3) activities of antioxidant enzymes were enhanced by 56-127%, mitigating oxidative damage; (4) membership function analysis ranked drought resistance as follows: Xianglin 27 (0.812) > Guangxi Superior Germplasm (0.698) > C. yuhsienensis (0.654) > Hunan Superior Germplasm (0.591) > Xianglin 1 (0.523); (5) qRT-PCR revealed significant upregulation of ABA signaling pathway genes (CoPYL6, CoPP2C75/51/24/26, CoSnRK2.8, and CoABI5) and transcription factors (CoLHY and CoWRKY70), indicating activation of drought-responsive regulatory networks. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for selecting drought-tolerant rootstocks and optimizing cultivation practices in Camellia oleifera, and provide practical criteria for selecting drought-tolerant rootstocks, facilitating sustainable Camellia oleifera cultivation in water-limited regions.

Keywords: Camellia oleifera; comprehensive evaluation; drought stress; gene expression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of different soil moisture content on five different rootstock C. oleifera grafting combinations Pn (A), Gs (B), Ci (C), Tr (D), Fv/Fm (E), and WUE (F). Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences in the mean values of different combinations under the same soil moisture content (p < 0.05), and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in the mean values of the same combination under different soil moisture contents (p < 0.05). T1, T2, T3—soil moisture treatments corresponding to 6, 8, and 10 days of water withholding, respectively; C1, C2, C3, C4, C5—different rootstock–scion grafting combinations (see Table 1 for details). Pn—net photosynthetic rate; Gs—stomatal conductance; Ci—intercellular CO2 concentration; Tr—transpiration rate; WUE—water use efficiency; Fv/Fm—theoretical maximum photochemical efficiency.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of different soil moisture content on five different rootstock C.a oleifera grafting combinations: Pro (A), TP (B), SS (C), and MDA (D). Different uppercase letters indicated significant differences in the mean values of different combinations under the same soil moisture content (p < 0.05), and different lowercase letters indicated significant differences in the mean values of the same combinations under different soil moisture contents (p < 0.05). T1, T2, T3—Soil moisture treatments corresponding to 6, 8, and 10 days of water withholding, respectively; C1, C2, C3, C4, C5—different rootstock–scion grafting combinations (see Table 1 for details). MDA—malondialdehyde; Pro—proline; SS—soluble sugars; TP—total phosphorus.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of different soil moisture content on five different rootstock C. oleifera grafting combinations: SOD (A), POD (B), CAT (C), and GSH (D). Different uppercase letters indicated significant differences in the mean values of different combinations under the same soil moisture content (p < 0.05), and different lowercase letters indicated significant differences in the mean values of the same combinations under different soil moisture contents (p < 0.05). T1, T2, T3—soil moisture treatments corresponding to 6, 8, and 10 days of water withholding, respectively; C1, C2, C3, C4, C5—different rootstock–scion grafting combinations (see Table 1 for details). SOD—superoxide dismutase; POD—peroxidase; CAT—catalase; GSH—reduced glutathione.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of different soil moisture contents on the expression levels of five combinations of CoRbcL (A), CoLHY (B), CoGI (C), CoGATA8 (D) and CoWRKY70 (E). Vertical bars indicate standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). T1, T2, T3—soil moisture treatments corresponding to 6, 8, and 10 days of water withholding, respectively; C1, C2, C3, C4, C5—different rootstock–scion grafting combinations (see Table 1 for details).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effects of different soil water contents on the expression levels of CoPYL6 (A), CoPP2C16 (B), CoPP2C24 (C), CoPP2C51 (D), CoPP2C75 (E), CoSnRK2.8 (F), CoABI5 (G), and CoSAUR32 (H) in five combined grafting seedlings. Vertical bars indicate standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). T1, T2, T3—soil moisture treatments corresponding to 6, 8, and 10 days of water withholding, respectively; C1, C2, C3, C4, C5—different rootstock–scion grafting combinations (see Table 1 for details).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wang Y., Shi J., Liu K., Wang Y., Xu Y., Liu Y. Metabolomics and gene expression levels reveal the positive effects of teaseed oil on lifespan and aging process in Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness. 2023;12:1391–1401. doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2022.10.032. - DOI
    1. Qin P., Shen J., Wei J., Chen Y. A critical review of the bioactive ingredients and biological functions of camellia oleifera oil. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2024;8:100753. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100753. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zheng H., Chen F., Ouyang Z., Tu N., Xu W., Wang X., Miao H., Li X., Tian Y. Impacts of reforestation approaches on runoff control in the hilly red soil region of Southern China. J. Hydrol. 2008;356:174–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.04.007. - DOI
    1. Lee C.P., Yen G.C. Antioxidant activity and bioactive compounds of tea seed (Camellia oleifera Abel.) oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006;54:779–784. doi: 10.1021/jf052325a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feng M., Zhang A., Nguyen V., Bisht A., Almqvist C., De Veylder L., Carlsbecker A., Melnyk C.W. A conserved graft formation process in Norway spruce and Arabidopsis identifies the PAT gene family as central regulators of wound healing. Nat. Plants. 2024;10:53–65. doi: 10.1038/s41477-023-01568-w. - DOI - PMC - PubMed