Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 26;4(8):pgaf239.
doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf239. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Commonly observed sex differences in direct aggression are absent or reversed in sibling contexts

Affiliations

Commonly observed sex differences in direct aggression are absent or reversed in sibling contexts

Michael E W Varnum et al. PNAS Nexus. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Decades of research support the generalization that human males tend to be more aggressive than females. However, most of that research has examined aggression between unrelated individuals. Data drawn from 24 societies around the globe (n = 4,013) indicate that this generalization does not hold in the context of sibling relationships. In retrospective self-reports, females report being at least as aggressive as males toward their siblings, often more so. This holds for direct as well as indirect aggression, and for aggression between adult siblings as well as aggression that occurred during childhood. Consistent with prior research on sex differences, males reported engaging in more direct aggression toward nonkin than did females in the majority of societies. The results suggest that the dynamics of aggression within the family are different from those outside of it, and ultimately that understanding the role of sex in aggressive tendencies depends on context and target.

Keywords: aggression; sex differences; siblings; universal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Comparison of female and male direct aggression toward siblings and nonsiblings as both children and adults.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Comparison of female and male gossiping about siblings and nonsiblings as both children and adults.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of female and male reporting siblings and nonsiblings to authority figures as both children and adults.

References

    1. Archer J. 2004. Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: a meta-analytic review. Rev Gen Psychol. 8(4):291–322.
    1. Daly M, Wilson M. Homicide. Routledge, London, 1988.
    1. Griskevicius V, et al. 2009. Aggress to impress: hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. J Pers Soc Psychol. 96:980–994. - PubMed
    1. Irwin V, Wang K, Cui J, Thompson A. Report on indicators of school crime and safety: 2021. NCES 2022-092/NCJ 304625. National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC, 2022.
    1. Tieger T. 1980. On the biological basis of sex differences in aggression. Child Dev. 51:943–963. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources