Anticoagulation and thromboembolic risk in critically ill patients with trigger-induced atrial fibrillation-A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 40875103
- PMCID: PMC12454756
- DOI: 10.1007/s12471-025-01978-9
Anticoagulation and thromboembolic risk in critically ill patients with trigger-induced atrial fibrillation-A systematic review and meta-analysis
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Anticoagulation and thromboembolic risk in critically ill patients with trigger-induced atrial fibrillation-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neth Heart J. 2025 Oct;33(10):327-329. doi: 10.1007/s12471-025-01991-y. Neth Heart J. 2025. PMID: 40960535 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Introduction: In critically ill patients with trigger-induced atrial fibrillation, there are no definitive recommendations on the use of anticoagulation. This study aimed to evaluate the association between anticoagulation therapy and outcomes (i.e. thromboembolism, bleeding and mortality) and examine prescription patterns in high-risk individuals based on CHA2DS2-VASc scores.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify studies reporting on anticoagulation prescription, thromboembolism, bleeding, and mortality. Anticoagulation rates and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were correlated, and a meta-analysis was conducted to compare short- and long-term outcomes.
Results: Anticoagulation prescription rates ranged from 3 to 86%; in over 50% of patients, CHA2DS2-VASc scores were ≥ 2 (n = 28 studies). A meta-analysis of eight observational studies, in which 95% of patients had sepsis/infection as the precipitant, demonstrated no association between anticoagulation and reduced short-term thromboembolism (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.61-1.28) or increased bleeding (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90-1.22). Short-term mortality was lower in the anticoagulation group (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39-0.75), but a higher long-term thromboembolic risk was observed (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.04-2.03).
Conclusion: The prescription of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with TIAF is highly variable. There is no clear evidence of benefit or harm, and neither routine use nor systematic omission is supported.
Keywords: Anticoagulation; Atrial fibrillation; Bleeding; Critical illness; Intensive care; Sepsis; Stroke; Thromboembolism.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: J. Koolwijk, M. van de Kar, B.A. van der Woude, M. van ’t Veer, H.J. de Grooth, H.J.G.M. Crijns, L.R.C. Dekker, R.A. Bouwman, O.L. Cremer, A.J.R. de Bie and L.C. Otterspoor declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Van Gelder IC, Rienstra M, Bunting KV, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2024;2024:ehae176. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
