Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 29;40(1):190.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04944-4.

Outcomes of embolization therapy of superior rectal arteries for the management of grade 1 to 3 internal hemorrhoids: a systematic Review of clinical studies

Affiliations
Review

Outcomes of embolization therapy of superior rectal arteries for the management of grade 1 to 3 internal hemorrhoids: a systematic Review of clinical studies

Mustafa Al Jnainati et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Superior rectal artery embolization ("Emborrhoid") offers a catheter-based alternative for grade I-III internal hemorrhoids when office therapies fail or surgery is undesirable.

Methods: Following PRISMA 2020, PubMed and Embase were searched (Jan 2014-Jan 2024). Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and applied RoB 2, ROBINS-I, or an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Prespecified outcomes were technical success, clinical success (≥ 2-point fall in bleeding score or equivalent), adverse events, and recurrence. Substantial heterogeneity blocked meta-analysis; results were narratively synthesized.

Results: Twenty-two studies encompassing 810 procedures qualified. Technical success reached 93-100%. Clinical success ranged from 63 to 94%, yielding marked bleeding control and symptom relief. Reported complications were mild and self-limited (pelvic discomfort, nausea, and low-grade fever); no ischemic injury, continence disturbance, or mortality occurred. Recurrence necessitating repeat treatment affected 8-20% of patients, usually when collateral arterial supply persisted. Patient-reported satisfaction exceeded 80% in every series. Only two small, heterogeneous comparative studies versus rubber-band ligation or sclerotherapy were available, precluding a pooled analysis.

Conclusions: Current evidence suggests Emborrhoid is a safe, effective bridge between office procedures and surgery-particularly valuable for frail or anticoagulated patients. Yet small single-center cohorts, disparate techniques, and scarce head-to-head trials limit external validity. Multicenter randomized studies with harmonized outcomes and ≥ 24-month follow-up are required to confirm long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and optimal patient selection.

Keywords: Embolic materials; Hemorrhoidal embolization; Minimally invasive therapy; Patient satisfaction; Recurrence rates; Superior rectal artery; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: None. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISA flowchart

Similar articles

References

    1. Mott T, Latimer K, Edwards C. Hemorrhoids: diagnosis and treatment options. - PubMed
    1. Sun Z, Migaly J (2016) Review of hemorrhoid disease: presentation and management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 29:22–29 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lohsiriwat V (2012) Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World J Gastroenterol 18:2009–2017 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lohsiriwat V (2015) Treatment of hemorrhoids: a coloproctologist’s view. World J Gastroenterol 21:9245–9252 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Talaie R, Torkian P, Moghadam AD, Tradi F, Vidal V, Sapoval M et al (2022) Hemorrhoid embolization: a review of current evidences. Diagn Interv Imaging 103:3–11 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources