Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Aug 28;25(1):897.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-08082-1.

Effectiveness of a prenatal pilates program on ligamentous laxity and joint hypermobility in pregnant women: a dual-center randomized controlled trial

Merve Bulguroglu  1 , Halil Ibrahim Bulguroglu  2 , Baran Degirmenci  3 , Selcan Suicmez  1 , Cansu Gevrek Aslan  1 , Serenay Zorlu Develik  1 , Nevin Atalay Guzel  4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of a prenatal pilates program on ligamentous laxity and joint hypermobility in pregnant women: a dual-center randomized controlled trial

Merve Bulguroglu et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy-related anatomical and hormonal changes, including increased relaxin levels, may cause ligamentous laxity and joint hypermobility, while also contributing to decreased overall body mobility, potentially affecting functional stability. Pilates, focusing on core strength and postural control, is recommended during pregnancy, but its effects on ligamentous laxity and joint hypermobility have not been tested in a randomized controlled trial. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a prenatal Pilates program on ligamentous laxity and joint hypermobility in pregnant women.

Methods: In this prospectively registered, dual-center randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06684002), 42 healthy primiparous women at 14-16 weeks' gestation were randomized to an 8-week structured prenatal Pilates program (n = 21) or standard prenatal care without exercise (n = 21). The intervention was delivered by the same certified physiotherapist at both centers to ensure consistency. Outcomes included anterior cruciate ligamentous laxity measured with the GNRB arthrometer, generalized joint hypermobility using the Beighton score, and activity limitations due to pelvic girdle pain assessed by the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire, evaluated at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks.

Results: Participants in the Pilates group showed no significant changes in ligamentous laxity and joint hypermobility and reported minimal activity limitations throughout the intervention (p > 0.05). In contrast, the control group demonstrated significant deterioration across all outcomes (p < 0.05). After 8 weeks, the Pilates group demonstrated significant improvements compared to the control group, with medium effect sizes for ligamentous laxity (p < 0.05, ηp² ≥ 0.06), a small effect size for joint hypermobility (p = 0.017, ηp² = 0.039), and a large effect size for activity limitations due to pelvic girdle pain (p = 0.021, ηp² = 0.317).

Conclusions: An 8-week structured prenatal Pilates program appears to effectively prevent the progression of ligamentous laxity and joint hypermobility while reducing activity limitations associated with pelvic girdle pain, supporting its integration into routine prenatal care to enhance maternal musculoskeletal stability, functional capacity, and quality of life during pregnancy.

Trial registration: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT06684002, registration date November 9, 2024.

Keywords: Joint hypermobility; Ligamentous laxity; Maternal musculoskeletal health; Pelvic girdle pain; Pregnancy; Prenatal pilates; Quality of life; Randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Institutional approval was obtained from the Ankara Medipol University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval No: 128). Informed consent, both written and verbal, was obtained from participants before the research commenced. The study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Written and verbal informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Sánchez-Polán M, Nagpal TS, Zhang D, Silva-Jose C, Montejo R, Barakat R. The influence of physical activity during pregnancy on maternal pain and discomfort: a meta-analysis. J Pers Med. 2023;14(1): 44. 10.3390/jpm14010044. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fiat F, Merghes PE, Scurtu AD, Guta BA, Dehelean CA, et al. The main changes in pregnancy-therapeutic approach to musculoskeletal pain. Medicina (B Aires). 2022;58(8): 1115. 10.3390/medicina58081115. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thorell E, Goldsmith L, Weiss G, Kristiansson P. Physical fitness, serum relaxin and duration of gestation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:168. 10.1186/s12884-015-0607-z. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conrad KP. Emerging role of relaxin in the maternal adaptations to normal pregnancy: implications for preeclampsia. Semin Nephrol. 2011;31(1):15–32. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2010.10.003. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dehghan F, Haerian BS, Muniandy S, Yusof A, Dragoo JL, Salleh N. The effect of relaxin on the musculoskeletal system. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(4):e220–9. 10.1111/sms.12149. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data