Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 1;29(4):348-358.
doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000907. Epub 2025 Aug 29.

Feasibility and Acceptability of Human Papillomavirus Based Self-sampling in Underserved Minorities in the United States: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Feasibility and Acceptability of Human Papillomavirus Based Self-sampling in Underserved Minorities in the United States: A Scoping Review

Joyce Zhang et al. J Low Genit Tract Dis. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the review evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in underscreened communities to increase cervical cancer screening rates in the United States.

Methods: Database searches were conducted on PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov using the following search terms: HPV or human papillomavirus viruses, self-sampling, self-swabbing, or self-collection, acceptability, feasibility, and United States. The study aims to identify factors related to the feasibility and acceptability of HPV self-sampling uptake.

Results: Sixteen studies were included in this scoping review. Most studies reviewed associated factors, such as demographic data (age and ethnicity), and socioeconomic data (income, education level, and insurance status). There was a higher HPV self-sampling rate (75%-100%) in the 11 studies where there was an in-person component including completing self-sampling kits in-person after recruitment, scheduled appointments or education sessions compared with studies where kits were returned by mail (3%-93%). Eleven studies measured acceptability and/or feasibility, and subjects reported the self-sampling process and devices were acceptable and easy to use. Of the 11 that measured feasibility and acceptability, 3 studies noted that the majority preferred self-sampling over clinician-collected Pap tests. Six studies incorporated community health worker-led education prior to distributing self-sampling kits, and improved attitudes toward self-sampling. Two studies evaluated the incidence of abnormal results between self-sampling and clinician-collected Pap test and found no difference.

Conclusions: HPV self-sampling is seen as an acceptable and feasible option for cervical cancer screening for underscreened individuals. Furthermore, patient-facing education components led by community health workers greatly influenced participants' decision to self-sample.

Keywords: HPV; HPV self-sampling; cervical cancer; cervical cancer screening; community health workers; minorities; self-sampling kits; underserved population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Fuzzell LN, Perkins RB, Christy SM, et al. Cervical cancer screening in the United States: challenges and potential solutions for underscreened groups. Prev Med 2021;144:106400.
    1. Perkins RB, Wentzensen N, Guido RS, et al. Cervical cancer screening and management of abnormal results—a review. JAMA 2023;330.
    1. Koliopoulos G, Nyaga VN, Santesso N, et al. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;10:2017.
    1. Serrano B, Ibáñez R, Robles C, et al. Worldwide use of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening. Prev Med 2022;154:106900.
    1. Hawkes D, Keung MHT, Huang Y, et al. Self-collection for cervical screening programs: from research to reality. Cancers 2020;12:1053.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources