Management of intracranial hypertension with and without invasive intracranial pressure monitoring
- PMID: 40880574
- PMCID: PMC12305074
- DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.105645
Management of intracranial hypertension with and without invasive intracranial pressure monitoring
Abstract
Management of intracranial hypertension (IH) has improved in the last decades driven by advancements in monitoring technologies and a deeper understanding of its pathophysiology. Although intracranial pressure (ICP) catheters are still recommended by current guidelines for monitoring patients at risk of IH, these methods are not without limitations. Challenges include procedural complications, availability of these devices in many healthcare settings and technical issues. In this context, management in the absence of ICP monitoring is common and now it can be augmented by intensivist-led point-of-care ultrasound, which includes tools such as transcranial doppler, optic nerve sheath measurement and brain ultrasound. These methods offer anatomic information that can sometimes withhold repeated head computed tomography (CT) scans, but they are also a window into ICP dynamics without the associated risks of invasive monitoring and are reasonable alternatives for guiding treatment, provided an integration between neurological examination, head CT anatomical findings and noninvasive monitors is considered. This manuscript synthesizes the evidence for using invasive ICP monitoring and methods for non-invasive monitoring, more focused on the role of ultrasound, given its wider availability. We also propose a practical approach of how to integrate this information at bedside to avoid both under and overtreatment, by embracing a clinical epidemiology paradigm to guide management decisions.
Keywords: Intracranial hypertension; Intracranial pressure; Neuroimaging; Neurophysiological monitoring; Transcranial doppler ultrasonography.
©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Chesnut R, Harris OA, Kissoon N, Rubiano AM, Shutter L, Tasker RC, Vavilala MS, Wilberger J, Wright DW, Ghajar J. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017;80:6–15. - PubMed
-
- Åkerlund CA, Donnelly J, Zeiler FA, Helbok R, Holst A, Cabeleira M, Güiza F, Meyfroidt G, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Stocchetti N, Ercole A, Nelson DW CENTER-TBI High Resolution ICU Sub-Study Participants and Investigators. Impact of duration and magnitude of raised intracranial pressure on outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI high-resolution group study. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0243427. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Heuer GG, Smith MJ, Elliott JP, Winn HR, LeRoux PD. Relationship between intracranial pressure and other clinical variables in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2004;101:408–416. - PubMed
-
- Sorrentino E, Diedler J, Kasprowicz M, Budohoski KP, Haubrich C, Smielewski P, Outtrim JG, Manktelow A, Hutchinson PJ, Pickard JD, Menon DK, Czosnyka M. Critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16:258–266. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
