The Mexican Version of the Interactive mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (Mx-MAUQ) in Women With Breast Cancer: Instrument Validation Study
- PMID: 40882212
- PMCID: PMC12396799
- DOI: 10.2196/72215
The Mexican Version of the Interactive mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (Mx-MAUQ) in Women With Breast Cancer: Instrument Validation Study
Abstract
Background: Successful eHealth applications require careful assessment to ensure their ease of use, usefulness, and user satisfaction. Responsive web applications are eHealth tools that operate on any internet-enabled device across all browsers. Psychometrically valid assessment tools are essential for effectively evaluating these applications, yet no validated eHealth questionnaire exists for assessing their usability and user satisfaction in Mexico.
Objective: The objective of this study is to adapt the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) for responsive web application assessment in Mexico and validate adapted Mx-MAUQ content, construct validity, internal consistency, and its ability to distinguish between patient subgroups.
Methods: We conducted a psychometric validation study of Mx-MAUQ with women aged 20 to 75 diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer who had begun neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment within the last six weeks and used the responsive "OncoMama App" for 1 month. The study excluded women with stage IV breast cancer, illiterate women, and those with blindness, cognitive disability, or severe depression. Participants were recruited from oncology services at 4 hospitals belonging to the Mexican Institute of Social Security between August 2023 and November 2024. The study involved translating and adapting the MAUQ while evaluating its content through expert panels and cognitive interviews with women. The Mx-MAUQ construct was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA), internal consistency via Cronbach α, and Mx-MAUQ's capacity to distinguish between subgroups of patients with breast cancer using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Results: A total of 210 women participated, with 75.2% (n=158) aged 60 or younger and 64.3% (n=135) having high school education. The expert panel granted all Mx-MAUQ items a content validity index (CVI) above 0.7. Experts have found that the MAUQ questions are general enough to be relevant not only to mobile apps or specific medical conditions but also to a variety of digital platforms, including responsive web applications and different health conditions. The cognitive interviews revealed 3 unclear terms in the questionnaire; consequently, we defined "application interface" and changed "social settings" to "social environments" and "manage my health" to "take care of my health." EFA identified 2 factors explaining 91.6% of the variance and retaining all items. The first factor, "Ease of Use," consists of 9 items and has a Cronbach α of .94. The second factor, "Satisfaction, Usefulness, and System Information Arrangement," includes 12 items and has a Cronbach α of .97. Women with higher education levels scored significantly higher for both factors, as well as the overall Mx-MAUQ score, than those with lower educational attainment.
Conclusions: Mx-MAUQ showed satisfactory psychometric properties based on EFA, internal consistency, and discriminant analysis, making it a suitable tool for a comprehensive assessment of the usability of interactive web-based eHealth applications for women with breast cancer in Mexico.
Keywords: Mexico; mHealth; psychometric validation; responsive web application; usability.
© Saúl Eduardo Contreras-Sánchez, Svetlana V Doubova, Iris Romero-Espinal, María Fernanda González-Garnica, Hannah H Leslie. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org).
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 1;9(12):e15433. doi: 10.2196/15433. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 34855618 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26212714 Free PMC article.
-
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39915110
-
Transcultural Adaptation, Validation, Psychometric Analysis, and Interpretation of the 22-Item Thai Senior Technology Acceptance Model for Mobile Health Apps: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Aging. 2025 Mar 11;8:e60156. doi: 10.2196/60156. JMIR Aging. 2025. PMID: 40068149 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO guideline recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Medline. - PubMed
-
- Seventy-first World Health Assembly. Geneva: World Health Organization; May 26, 2018. [01-12-2024]. Digital health resolution.https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA71/A71_R7-en.pdf URL. Accessed.
-
- Cancer today. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 2022. [13-12-2024]. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home URL. Accessed.
-
- Doubova SV, Aguirre-Hernandez R, Gutiérrez-de la Barrera M, Infante-Castañeda C, Pérez-Cuevas R. Supportive care needs of Mexican adult cancer patients: validation of the Mexican version of the Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Questionnaire (SCNS-SFM) Support Care Cancer. 2015 Sep;23(9):2711–2719. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2634-8. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical