BREEZE Optional Extension Phase: Long-term safety and efficacy of treprostinil dry powder inhaler (Tyvaso DPI) in pulmonary arterial hypertension
- PMID: 40882760
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108318
BREEZE Optional Extension Phase: Long-term safety and efficacy of treprostinil dry powder inhaler (Tyvaso DPI) in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Abstract
Introduction: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Prostacyclins, including treprostinil, are a mainstay of PAH treatment, particularly in patients with intermediate to high risk of death. Following the approval of treprostinil inhalation solution for PAH, treprostinil dry powder inhaler (DPI) was developed as a small, portable, low-maintenance device to improve patient experience.
Objective: The primary objective of the BREEZE study was to assess the safety and tolerability of treprostinil DPI in PAH.
Methods: BREEZE was a 3-week, single-arm, open-label study in which patients with PAH transitioned from a stable dose of treprostinil inhalation solution to a comparable dose of treprostinil DPI.
Results: Following the 3-week treatment phase, 49 of 51 patients opted to enroll in the Optional Extension Phase (OEP). Throughout the OEP, 6MWD continued to increase with a median change from baseline of 16 m at week 107 and over a third of patients experiencing an improvement of at least 30 m. Patient satisfaction with the DPI device was overwhelmingly positive while drug-related adverse events were infrequent and characteristic of prostacyclin therapy.
Conclusion: The BREEZE OEP successfully demonstrated the safety of long-term treatment with treprostinil DPI in patients with PAH.
Clinical trial registration: NCT03950739.
Keywords: Dry powder inhaler; Exercise capacity; Prostacyclin dosing; Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Treprostinil.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:CB has received grants or consulting fees from Merck, Insmed, Gossamer Bio, Liquidia, Aerovate, and Janssen. KEK has received consulting fees from and participated in Advisory Boards for United Therapeutics, Johnson and Johnson, and Merck. SJ has received consulting fees from United Therapeutics, Bellerophon, Bayer, and Acceleron, and participated in Advisory Boards for Janssen and Merck. HP has participated in Advisory Boards for United Therapeutics. RRJ has received grants or consulting fees from Janssen, Bayer, United Therapeutics, and Merck. SSa has received grants or consulting fees from Merck, United Therapeutics, Gossamer, Keros, Pulmovant, Liquidia, and Respira Therapeutics, and participated in advisory boards for United Therapeutics and Liquidia. TS has received consulting fees from and participated in advisory boards for United Therapeutics and Bayer. SSh has received grants from Liquidia, Pharmosa, and Gossamer. LS has received grants from Acceleron, Gossamer, Insmed, Merck, and Liquidia. CD, MB, PS, and CT are employees of United Therapeutics. The study protocol, protocol amendments, and informed consent forms were submitted for review and approved by each site's institutional review board or independent ethics committee.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
