Conditioning intensity in myelodysplastic patients aged ≥ 50 years undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT): a study on behalf of the chronic malignancies working party of the EBMT
- PMID: 40883614
- DOI: 10.1038/s41409-025-02682-3
Conditioning intensity in myelodysplastic patients aged ≥ 50 years undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT): a study on behalf of the chronic malignancies working party of the EBMT
Abstract
Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) is usually used for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), particularly in the elderly or those with comorbidities. The impact of conditioning intensity on patients' outcome remains controversial with clinicians' subjective opinion/ experience remaining a major guide in choosing the intensity. Here, we compare RIC versus MAC in a large EBMT retrospective study in MDS patients aged ≥50 years undergoing allo-HCT between 2014 and 2018. Among the 1393 included patients, 922 (66%) were males, and the median age at transplant was 62.8 (50.0-77.9) years. The majority of patients (n = 884; 64.3%) had MDS with excess blasts. IPSS-R recorded was very low/low (n = 598, 43%), intermediate (n = 352, 25%), and high/very high (n = 443, 32%). Karnofsky index was ≥90 in 916 (69.3%) patients, and HCT-CI ≥ 3 in 292(27.3%) patients. A RIC regimen was used in 1053 (75.5%) patients. Median follow-up was 27.9 months (IQR: 26.4-30.6). Both uni- and multi-variable analyses did not show any significant association between conditioning intensity and outcomes. This study highlights a lack of association between RIC/MAC regimens and outcomes in allo-HCT MDS patients. Our results support the recently published systematic review and meta-analysis, where evidence for using one conditioning regimen over another remains weak.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The scientific boards of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT approved this study. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Sheba Medical Center Helsinki Committee (SMC-770920). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
References
-
- Fenaux P, Platzbecker U, Mufti GJ, Garcia-Manero G, Buckstein R, Santini V, et al. Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. N. Engl J Med. 2020;382:140–51. - PubMed
-
- Sekeres MA, Taylor J. Diagnosis and Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Review. JAMA. 2022;328:872–80. - PubMed
-
- Robin M, de Witte T. Myelodysplastic Syndromes. In: Carreras E, Dufour C, Mohty M, Kroger N, editors. The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. Cham (CH) 2019. p. 547-56.
-
- Shimoni A, Robin M, Iacobelli S, Beelen D, Mufti GJ, Ciceri F, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome using treosulfan based compared to other reduced-intensity or myeloablative conditioning regimens. A report of the chronic malignancies working party of the EBMT. Br J Haematol. 2021;195:417–28. - PubMed
-
- Martino R, Henseler A, van Lint M, Schaap N, Finke J, Beelen D, et al. Long-term follow-up of a retrospective comparison of reduced-intensity conditioning and conventional high-dose conditioning for allogeneic transplantation from matched related donors in myelodysplastic syndromes. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2017;52:1107–12.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous