Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 29;25(1):841.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07252-x.

Integrating multiple feature assessment methods to identify key predictors of repeat suicide attempts in Taiwan

Affiliations

Integrating multiple feature assessment methods to identify key predictors of repeat suicide attempts in Taiwan

Joh-Jong Huang et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: The high rate of repeat attempts among individuals who have previously attempted suicide presents a critical challenge in public health and suicide prevention. While early and targeted intervention is crucial for this high-risk group, effectively identifying those most likely to re-attempt is a persistent difficulty, especially when public health resources are limited. This creates a pressing need for accurate and practical risk assessment tools. This study aims to address this gap by using machine learning to analyze a nationwide suicide surveillance database to identify key predictors of repeat suicide attempts and develop a robust predictive model to aid in resource allocation and early intervention.

Methods: This study analyzed data from 32,701 individuals, encompassing 31 features, recorded in Taiwan's National Suicide Surveillance System for 2020. We employed binary decision tree regression with multiple feature selection techniques to identify significant predictors of recurrent suicide attempts. A prediction model was then developed without requiring biological samples.

Results: History of mental illness, specific age groups, and supervision status of mentally ill patients emerged as primary influences on repeated suicide attempts. The prediction model achieved 66.3% accuracy in identifying potential repeat attempters, with a 57.9% success rate for predicting re-suicide events. These findings align with recent literature on suicide recurrence risk factors.

Conclusions: This study provides a practical risk assessment tool that enables early intervention for high-risk individuals without invasive biological sampling. The insights offer valuable guidance for government suicide prevention policies, especially when prioritizing cases with limited resources. Future enhancements through broader data integration and interdisciplinary cooperation could establish a more comprehensive prevention system to reduce the societal impact of suicidal behavior.

Trial registration: Not applicable as this was a retrospective database analysis rather than a randomized controlled trial.

Keywords: History of past mental illness; Prevention; Suicide; Suicide behavior; Surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study protocol, titled"Development and Evaluation of National Suicide Prevention Strategies: Study on Integrative Data Bank of Public Health,"was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University (NTU-REC) on June 11, 2024 (Approval No.: 202404HM037). Consent for publication: All authors have reviewed the manuscript and agreed to its publication. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Decision Tree Model Interpretability Results. Utilizing a tree structure to examine the top 10 significant levels affecting repeated suicide attempts
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MRMR algorithm
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Chi-Squared test
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ReliefF algorithm
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
ANOVA algorithm
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Kruskal–Wallis test
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Confusion matrix for optimizable tree model

Similar articles

References

    1. Giabbanelli PJ, Rice KL, Nataraj N, Brown MM, Harper CR. A systems science approach to identifying data gaps in national data sources on adolescent suicidal ideation and suicide attempt in the United States. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):627. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thorne B, O’Reilly M. Operationalizing strategic objectives of suicide prevention policy: police-led LOSST LIFFE model. Death Stud. 2022;46(9):2077–84. - PubMed
    1. Haroz EE, Grubin F, Goklish N, Pioche S, Cwik M, Barlow A, Waugh E, Usher J, Lenert MC, Walsh CG. Designing a clinical decision support tool that leverages machine learning for suicide risk prediction: development study in partnership with native American care providers. JMIR Public Health Surveillance. 2021;7(9):e24377 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Myhre MO, Kildahl AT, Astrup H, Bergsager D, Walby FA: Suicide in services for mental health and substance use: a national hybrid registry surveillance system. Health Inform J. 2023;29(1):14604582231167439. - PubMed
    1. Ranapurwala SI, Miller VE, Carey TS, Gaynes BN, Keil AP, Fitch CV, Swilley-Martinez ME, Kavee AL, Cooper T, Dorris S, et al. Innovations in suicide prevention research (INSPIRE): a protocol for a population-based case-control study. Inj Prev. 2022;28(5):483–90. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources