Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;111(5):379-389.
doi: 10.1177/03008916251346564. Epub 2025 Aug 30.

Delphi Study on the creation of a Committee of patients, caregivers, and representatives of patient associations

Laura Gangeri  1 , Sara Alfieri  1 , Valeria Anselmi  2 , Bianca Scacciati  1 , Elena Germini  3 , Silvia Bernardelli  3 , Cinzia Brunelli  4 , Claudia Borreani  1
Affiliations

Delphi Study on the creation of a Committee of patients, caregivers, and representatives of patient associations

Laura Gangeri et al. Tumori. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Background: As part of the improvement plan of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan (INT) a Committee composed of patients, caregivers, and representatives of patient associations has been established to actively participate in the planning and organization of both hospital services and research initiatives. The potential impact of implementation of the Committee could ensure a patient-centered care environment.

Aim: To determine whether there is consensus among INT staff on key aspects of the Committee.

Method: Selected INT staff (experts) were invited to participate in a Delphi study. Each expert was asked to rate their agreement on 13 statements and give a brief explanation for their answers. Only the statements that failed to reach an 80% consensus were reintroduced in the second round, following the same procedures.

Results: Ninety experts responded to Round I (55.21% response rate). Eight statements reached the 80% consensus threshold, while five did not meet the predefined threshold and were therefore re-proposed in the second round. These statements concerned the Committee's role (advisory vs decision-making), the perceived value of the Committee in research (improvement vs no involvement), and participant compensation (voluntary vs paid). In Round II, 69 experts participated (79.31% response rate), but none of the reintroduced statements reached the required consensus threshold.

Conclusion: Although a Committee is a topic of theoretical interest and aligns with respondents' values, the establishment of a Committee in INT is currently difficult to implement. Training and awareness initiatives are necessary, as requested by respondents.

Keywords: Cancer; Delphi; consensus; involvement; patient; public health; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Entwistle VA, Watt IS. Treating patients as persons: a capabilities approach to support delivery of person-centered care. Am J Bioethics 2013; 13: 29–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E, et al. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2018; 13: 1–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richards T, Montori VM, Godlee F, et al. Let the patient revolution begin. BMJ 2013; 346: f2614. - PubMed
    1. Baumann LA, Brütt AL. Public and patient involvement (PPI) in health policy decisionmaking on the health system-level: protocol for a systematic scoping review. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e043650. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vinnicombe S, Bianchim MS, Noyes J. A review of reviews exploring patient and public involvement in population health research and development of tools containing best practice guidance. BMC Pub Health 2023; 23: 1271. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources