Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 30;19(1):533.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02711-9.

Microscopic positive surgical margins in robotic thyroidectomy: does robotic approach make a difference?

Affiliations

Microscopic positive surgical margins in robotic thyroidectomy: does robotic approach make a difference?

Jeongshin An et al. J Robot Surg. .

Abstract

Microscopic positive surgical margin (mPSM) is a known risk factor of recurrence in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. While robotic thyroidectomy has gained acceptance as an alternative to open surgery, its impact on margin status remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 2587 cases with differentiated thyroid cancer who underwent thyroid surgery between 2009 and 2023. Of these, 206 underwent robotic and 2381 underwent open thyroidectomy. The mPSM rate was comparable between robotic and open groups (4.4 vs. 3.9%, p = 0.743). Multivariable analysis identified larger tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, and multifocality as independent predictors of mPSM, whereas coexisting Hashimoto thyroiditis was associated with a decreased risk. Robotic approach was not an independent risk factor for mPSM (odds ratio 1.647, 95% CI 0.762-3.560). After propensity-score matching, mPSM rates remained similar (4.4% vs 3.4, p = 0.548). In conclusion, robotic thyroidectomy demonstrated oncologic safety comparable to that of open surgery in terms of microscopic margin involvement.

Keywords: Microscopic positive margin; Robot-assisted surgery; Thyroid cancer; Thyroidectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I et al (2024) Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 74(3):229–263 - PubMed
    1. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE et al (2016) 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 26(1):1–133 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Son SK, Kim JH, Bae JS, Lee SH (2015) Surgical safety and oncologic effectiveness in robotic versus conventional open thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22(9):3022–3032 - PubMed
    1. Kim H, Kwon H, Lim W, Moon BI, Paik NS (2019) Quantitative assessment of the learning curve for robotic thyroid surgery. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030402 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Zhang X, Yu J, Zhu J, Wei H, Meng N, Hu M et al (2024) A meta-analysis of unilateral axillary approach for robotic surgery compared with open surgery for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. PLoS ONE 19(4):e0298153 - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources