Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors for Resistant Hypertension: Pharmacological Insights - A Systematic Review
- PMID: 40885884
- PMCID: PMC12572095
- DOI: 10.1007/s40265-025-02229-2
Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors for Resistant Hypertension: Pharmacological Insights - A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Resistant hypertension (RHT) is a challenging clinical condition characterized by persistently elevated blood pressure despite adherence to lifestyle modifications and the use of at least three antihypertensive agents, including a high-dose diuretic. RHT is a heterogeneous condition, influenced by multiple pathophysiological mechanisms such as sodium retention, sympathetic overactivity, and vascular dysfunction. Among these, hyperaldosteronism plays a pivotal role in a subset of patients.
Methods: This systematic review examines in depth the pharmacokinetic properties of aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs), with a focus on their therapeutic potential in patients with RHT. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify clinical trials and pharmacological studies investigating ASIs, including baxdrostat, dexfadrostat, lorundrostat, LY3045697, and osilodrostat (LCI699).
Results: ASIs have shown compelling efficacy in lowering both office-based and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, particularly in patients with elevated aldosterone levels. These findings underscore the critical role of aldosterone-mediated mechanisms in the pathophysiology of RHT. The inhibitors differ substantially in their metabolic pathways, selectivity profiles, and pharmacokinetic characteristics.
Conclusions: Emerging data support the potential of ASIs as a therapeutic option for RHT, particularly when treatment is individualized based on renal function, dietary sodium intake, and comorbidities. Personalized treatment strategies may enhance efficacy, improve tolerability, and support durable blood pressure control in this difficult-to-treat population.
Registration: PROSPERO identifier number CRD42024522918 [Graphical abstract available].
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Funding: Open access funding provided by Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. Author Contributions: Conceptualization: AFGC and FF. Data curation: AFGC, GT, AA, PP, GN, FP, CB, and FF. Investigation: AFGC, GT, AA, PP, and FF. Methodology: AFGC, GT, AA, PP, GN, FP, CB, and FF. Project administration: AFGC, GT, and FF. Supervision: AFGC and FF. Visualization: AA, FP, and FF. Writing: AFGC, GT, AA, PP, and FF. Reviewing and editing: GN, FP, and CB Data Availability Statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. Conflicts of Interest: Claudio Borghi has received personal fees from Servier Pharma, EGIS Pharma, the Menarini Group, and Mineralys Therapeutics. Arrigo FG Cicero, Giuliano Tocci, Ashot Avagimyan, Peter Penson, Giulia Nardoianni, Francesco Perone, and Federica Fogacci have no potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript. Ethics Approval: Not applicable. Code Availability: Not applicable. Consent to Participate: Not applicable. Consent for Publication: Not applicable.
Figures
References
-
- Chan RJ, Helmeczi W, Hiremath SS. Revisiting resistant hypertension: a comprehensive review. Intern Med J. 2023;53(10):1739–51. 10.1111/imj.16189. - PubMed
-
- Noubiap JJ, Nansseu JR, Nyaga UF, Sime PS, Francis I, Bigna JJ. Global prevalence of resistant hypertension: a meta-analysis of data from 3.2 million patients. Heart. 2019;105(2):98–105. 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313599. - PubMed
-
- Weir MR, Hsueh WA, Nesbitt SD, Littlejohn TJ 3rd, Graff A, Shojaee A, Waverczak WF, Qian C, Jones CJ, Neutel JM. A titrate-to-goal study of switching patients uncontrolled on antihypertensive monotherapy to fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil ± hydrochlorothiazide. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13(6):404–12. 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00437.x. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Duprez D, Ferdinand K, Purkayastha D, Samuel R, Wright R. Ambulatory blood pressure response to triple therapy with an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB), calcium-channel blocker (CCB), and HCTZ versus dual therapy with an ARB and HCTZ. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:701–8. 10.2147/VHRM.S25743. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Williams B, MacDonald TM, Morant S, Webb DJ, Sever P, McInnes G, Ford I, Cruickshank JK, Caulfield MJ, Salsbury J, Mackenzie I, Padmanabhan S, Brown MJ, British Hypertension Society’s PATHWAY Studies Group. Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10008):2059–68. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00257-3. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
