Co-production as an approach for developing youth advocacy videos on countering unhealthy food marketing and e-cigarette advertising
- PMID: 40885906
- PMCID: PMC12398034
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-24095-z
Co-production as an approach for developing youth advocacy videos on countering unhealthy food marketing and e-cigarette advertising
Abstract
Background: Community-based participatory research has been a cornerstone of health promotion and public health for over two decades, providing a foundation for co-production approaches that actively involve communities in the design and implementation of interventions. This paper examines the application of co-production as a research approach for developing youth advocacy videos on countering unhealthy food marketing and e-cigarette advertising.
Methodology: The research to co-produce videos was conducted with 33 young people aged between 12 and 16 living in the Central Belt of Scotland. The research comprised four stages: workshops, photovoice, focus groups and video development.
Results: The findings presented are derived from the co-production process involved in creating two youth advocacy videos on unhealthy food marketing and e-cigarette advertising. Through this approach, young co-researchers were provided with opportunities to both learn about and conduct research, fostering their active involvement at every stage of the project. Co-production with young co-researchers enhanced the relevance and impact of advocacy videos, empowering participants through authentic collaboration. While challenges like power dynamics, engagement, and ethical considerations arose, fostering trust, inclusivity, and skill-building ensured success. The project highlighted the importance of youth-led approaches in creating relatable content and developing leadership and practical skills for broader applications. The advocacy videos produced in this study emphasise the critical importance of engaging young co-researchers in the research process. They highlight the necessity of safeguarding young people from harmful advertising practices while empowering them to take an active role in shaping health interventions.
Conclusion: This research underscores the value of co-production in health promotion, demonstrating its effectiveness in tailoring interventions to the unique perspectives and needs of the target audience. Notably, it also addresses a significant gap in the existing evidence base, which has historically focused on individual interventions rather than systemic or community-level approaches.
Keywords: Co-production; Health promotion; Participatory research; Young people; Youth advocacy.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval for this study was granted by the College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences Research Ethics Committee at the University of Glasgow (reference 200220088). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their involvement in the study. Consent for publication: All participants provided written informed consent for the publication of findings derived from this study. Participants were informed about how their data, including any anonymised quotes or contributions, would be presented in publications. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Creating the conditions for meaningful and effective PPIE in community-based public health research: learning from a UK-wide lived experience panel.Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 17;11(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00727-x. Res Involv Engagem. 2025. PMID: 40676654 Free PMC article.
-
The role and contribution of experts by experience in building research capacity in adult social care services: findings from the script study.Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 25;11(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00779-z. Res Involv Engagem. 2025. PMID: 40855577 Free PMC article.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(22):1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40417997 Review.
References
-
- Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156–65. - PubMed
-
- Popay J, Williams G. Public health research and lay knowledge. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(5):759–68. - PubMed
-
- Hughes R. Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- MC_UU_00022/2/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_UU_00022/3/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_UU_00022/2/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- SPHSU17/Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate
- SPHSU18/Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous