Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 31:pvaf051.
doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf051. Online ahead of print.

Long-term effectiveness of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Affiliations

Long-term effectiveness of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Anna B C Humphreys et al. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. .

Abstract

Aims: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are effective in the long-term treatment of myocardial infarction with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, it is unknown whether there is a benefit in myocardial infarction with preserved LVEF (≥50%).

Methods and results: We used Swedish healthcare registries to emulate a target trial of ACEi/ARBs vs. no ACEi/ARBs for the prevention of a composite outcome (death, myocardial infarction, or heart failure) and its individual components among individuals under 75 years with myocardial infarction and LVEF ≥ 50% between September 2010 and June 2021. We estimated observational analogues of the intention-to-treat effect and the per-protocol effect with confounding adjustment via inverse probability weighting. The 10 697 individuals in the ACEi/ARB group were on average older (median 61 vs. 60 years) and more likely to be male (80.2% vs. 75.3% male) than the 4730 individuals in the no ACEi/ARB group. The estimated 5-year risk of the composite outcome was 7.8% (95% confidence interval 7.1%, 8.5%) in the ACEi/ARB group and 8.1% (7.0%, 9.3%) in the no ACEi/ARB group; risk difference -0.3% (-1.6%, 1.0%). After adjustment for adherence, the risk of the composite outcome was 6.5% (5.9%, 7.2%) in the ACEi/ARB group and 6.7% (5.6%, 8.1%) in the no ACEi/ARB group; risk difference -0.2% (-1.7%, 1.0%).

Conclusion: The estimated risk of a composite of death, myocardial infarction or heart failure was similar in recipients and non-recipients of ACEi/ARB. Our estimates suggest ACEi/ARB treatment in myocardial infarction with preserved LVEF does not confer a benefit.

Keywords: Angiotensin receptor blocker; Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; Myocardial infarction; Observational study; Preserved left ventricular ejection fraction; Target trial emulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: R.H. reports lecture and consulting fees to institution from AstraZeneca, Pfizer and BMS. O.F. reports consulting fees from GSK and speaker’s fees from Sanofi Pasteur and Pfizer. M.A.H. is a consultant to ProPublica and Adigens Health, a company of which he owns equity, and a member of ADIALab’s Advisory Board. His interests were declared, reviewed, and approved by Harvard University in accordance with its institutional compliance policies. A.B.C.H. is a shareholder in Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson and Procter and Gamble.

LinkOut - more resources