Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 31:e70035.
doi: 10.1111/bpa.70035. Online ahead of print.

cIMPACT-NOW update 11: Proposal on adaptation of diagnostic criteria for IDH- and H3-wildtype diffuse high-grade gliomas and for posterior fossa ependymal tumors

Affiliations

cIMPACT-NOW update 11: Proposal on adaptation of diagnostic criteria for IDH- and H3-wildtype diffuse high-grade gliomas and for posterior fossa ependymal tumors

Pieter Wesseling et al. Brain Pathol. .

Abstract

The Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to Central Nervous System Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) updates provide guidelines for the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) tumors and suggestions for future World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Following publication of the fifth edition WHO Classification of CNS Tumors (WHO CNS5) in 2021, the cIMPACT-NOW working group "Clarification" reviewed WHO CNS5 and prioritized two topics for further elucidation: (a) distinction of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype from Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype and (b) clarification of subgroups of posterior fossa (PF) ependymal tumors. Recommendations regarding the IDH- and H3-wildtype diffuse high-grade gliomas include: (1) use caution assigning CNS WHO grade 4 (diagnosis of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype) to a "TERT promoter only", histologically low-grade, IDH-wildtype tumor; (2) EGFR gene amplification and +7/-10 chromosome copy number alterations should not be used as solitary defining features for diagnosing high-grade gliomas as Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype in patients <40 years of age; (3) Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype should be considered in the differential diagnosis in adults, especially those <40 years of age; (4) PDGFRA alteration, EGFR alteration, or MYCN amplification count as key molecular features of Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype only in patients <25 years. Guidelines for improved diagnosis of posterior fossa ependymal tumors include: (1) immunohistochemical demonstration of nuclear EZHIP supports classification as PF group A ependymoma; (2) a PF ependymoma with retained nuclear H3 K27me3 expression and no nuclear EZHIP overexpression for which DNA methylation profiling is not performed should be considered as PF ependymoma, "not otherwise specified"; (3) for emerging tumors not included in WHO CNS5, "not elsewhere classified" (NEC) can be added to the diagnosis. Of note, these recommendations are not formal changes to the WHO definitions and diagnostic criteria but are intended to provide diagnostic guidance in advance of WHO CNS6.

Keywords: Glioblastoma, IDH‐wildtype; WHO classification; cIMPACT‐NOW; clarification; diffuse pediatric‐type high‐grade glioma; posterior fossa ependymoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK. World Health Organization histological classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2016.
    1. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella‐Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
    1. Capper D, Jones DTW, Sill M, Hovestadt V, Schrimpf D, Sturm D, et al. DNA methylation‐based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature. 2018;555(7697):469–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26000
    1. Capper D, Stichel D, Sahm F, Jones DTW, Schrimpf D, Sill M, et al. Practical implementation of DNA methylation and copy‐number‐based CNS tumor diagnostics: the Heidelberg experience. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136(2):181–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1879-y
    1. Aldape K, Capper D, von Deimling A, Giannini C, Gilbert MR, Hawkins C, et al. cIMPACT‐NOW update 9: recommendations on utilization of genome‐wide DNA methylation profiling for central nervous system tumor diagnostics. Neurooncol Adv. 2025;7(1):vdae228. https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae228

LinkOut - more resources