Awake versus asleep craniotomy for eloquent glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 40887547
- DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03787-5
Awake versus asleep craniotomy for eloquent glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Awake craniotomy (AC) can aid in preserving neurological function through intraoperative mapping of sensorimotor and language functions. It has been associated with increased extent of resection (EOR) and reduced neurological deficits in glioma patients. Most studies focused on low grade tumours and there remains limited evidence assessing utility of AC for glioblastoma (GB). This systematic review evaluates current evidence for safety and efficacy of GB resection under AC versus general anaesthetic (GA) conditions. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of original studies assessing comparative outcomes of supratentorial GB resection via AC versus GA. Studies included patients > 18 years of age, with histopathological diagnosis of Grade 4 GB affecting an eloquent location. Medline, Embase and Pubmed were searched from inception to the 30th of June 2025. The outcomes assessed included: EOR, rates of temporary and permanent post-operative neurological deficits, survival, and functional outcomes. Eleven studies were included, with 1355 patients (402 AC and 953 GA resections). AC achieved greater percentage EOR (MD = 7.55 [CI 2.94-12.15], p = 0.001), and non-significant increase in rates of gross total resection (OR = 1.66 [CI 0.64-4.35], p = 0.30). The risk of developing a post-operative neurological deficit was significantly lower with AC (OR = 0.55 [CI:0.36-0.85], p = 0.008). Overall survival (HR = 7.99 [CI 2.29-13.69], p = 0.007) was significantly increased with AC but there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (HR = 2.03 [CI -1.32-5.37], p = 0.23). AC for eloquently located GB is associated with improved EOR, survival and lower risk of neurological complications. When feasible, AC should be considered for eloquent GB resection.
Keywords: Awake surgery; Eloquent; General anaesthesia; Glioblastoma.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Human ethics and consent to participate : not applicable. Clinical trial number: not applicable.
References
-
- Brodbelt A, Greenberg D, Winters T, Williams M, Vernon S, Collins VP (2015) Glioblastoma in england: 2007–2011. Eur J Cancer 51(4):533–542 - PubMed
-
- Curzi C, Giordan E, Guerriero A, Bendini M, Canova G, Feletti A, Marton E (2023) The extent of resection of T2-flair hyperintense area for eloquent glioblastomas: outcomes analysis between awake and general anesthesia patients. J Neurosurg Sci 67(4):480–490 - PubMed
-
- Duffau H, Capelle L, Denvil D, Sichez N, Gatignol P, Taillandier L, Lopes M, Mitchell MC, Roche S, Muller JC, Bitar A, Sichez JP, van Effenterre R (2003) Usefulness of intraoperative electrical subcortical mapping during surgery for low-grade gliomas located within eloquent brain regions: functional results in a consecutive series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg 98:764–778 - PubMed
-
- Duffau H, Lopes M, Arthuis F et al (2005) Contribution of intraoperative electrical stimulations in surgery of low grade gliomas: a comparative study between two series without (1985-96) and with (1996–2003) functional mapping in the same institution. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:845–851 - PubMed - PMC
-
- Duffau H (2012) The challenge to remove diffuse low-grade gliomas while preserving brain functions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154(4):569–574 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
