Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;28(5):e70407.
doi: 10.1111/hex.70407.

Smart Rings in Remote Monitoring at Home: Older Patients' Perceptions and Expectations

Affiliations

Smart Rings in Remote Monitoring at Home: Older Patients' Perceptions and Expectations

Melika Azim Zadegan et al. Health Expect. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Background: There is a limited understanding of how older patients perceive the potential of using wearables for remote monitoring (RM) at home. Exploring patients' perspectives prior to the implementation of wearables in healthcare can offer valuable insights into what may enhance the effectiveness and outcomes of RM.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to explore the expectations of older patients with a susceptible chronic illness towards prospective use of the Oura Ring for health monitoring at home. Unlike previous research, which primarily addresses patients' experiences during or after RM has taken place, we explored their perspective before the use.

Methods: Healthcare professionals identified the 10 study participants among those who were undergoing a diagnostic procedure for the chronic neurological disease iNPH at the Kuopio University Hospital in Finland. All invited patients consented to participate. Qualitative interview data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke.

Findings: Patients expected Oura to support both health and broader well-being through self-tracking and proactive health management, presenting themselves as active contributors to their care. Being monitored by healthcare professionals or caregivers was viewed as reassuring, mirroring the increasing digitalisation of healthcare and a reduction in in-person contact.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the relevance of approaching older patients with chronic conditions to gauge interest in home-based RM. This emphasises involving the patient perspective early on in RM processes, including decisions about the specific solutions to be used.

Patient or public contribution: The second author is a trained patient expert by experience who ensured that the analysis and the findings were grounded in authentic patient perspectives. The findings were shared with the study participants in the form of an information leaflet, the quality of which was ensured by the expert by experience.

Keywords: aged; digital health; interview; patients; qualitative research; remote patient monitoring; wearable electronic devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Thematic framework of the study. Arrows indicate how the main themes contribute to the research question.

References

    1. LeBaron V., “Challenges and Opportunities in Designing and Deploying Remote Health Monitoring Technology for Older Adults With Cancer,” Innovation in Aging 6, no. 6 (2022): 1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moldovan F. and Moldovan L., “An Innovative Assessment Framework for Remote Care in Orthopedics,” Healthcare 13, no. 7 (2025): 736. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tan S. Y., Sumner J., Wang Y., and Wenjun Yip A., “A Systematic Review of the Impacts of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Interventions on Safety, Adherence, Quality‐of‐Life and Cost‐Related Outcomes,” NPJ Digital Medicine 7, no. 192 (2024): 192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker R. C., Tong A., Howard K., and Palmer S. C., “Patient Expectations and Experiences of Remote Monitoring for Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies,” International Journal of Medical Informatics 124 (2019): 78–85. - PubMed
    1. Somani S. N., Yu K. M., Chiu A. G., Sykes K. J., and Villwock J. A., “Consumer Wearables for Patient Monitoring in Otolaryngology: A State of the Art Review,” Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 167, no. 4 (2022): 620–631. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources