Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;34(18):e70063.
doi: 10.1111/mec.70063. Epub 2025 Sep 2.

Recent Adaptation in a Threatened Salmonid Revealed by Museum Genomics

Affiliations

Recent Adaptation in a Threatened Salmonid Revealed by Museum Genomics

Andrew G Sharo et al. Mol Ecol. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) is an imperilled salmonid with two main life history strategies: migrate to the ocean or remain in freshwater. Domesticated hatchery forms of this species have been stocked into almost all California waterways, possibly resulting in introgression into natural populations and altered population structure. We compared whole-genome sequence data from contemporary populations against a set of museum population samples of steelhead from the same locations that were collected prior to most hatchery stocking. We observed minimal introgression and few steelhead-hatchery trout hybrids despite a century of extensive stocking. Our historical data show signals of introgression with a sister species and indications of an early hatchery facility. Finally, we found that migration-associated haplotypes have become less frequent over time, a likely adaptation to decreased opportunities for migration. Since contemporary migration-associated haplotype frequencies have been used to guide species management, we consider this to be a rare example of shifting baseline syndrome that has been validated with historical data. We suggest cautious optimism that a century of hatchery stocking has had minimal impact on California steelhead population genetic structure, but we note that continued shifts in life history may lead to further declines in the ocean-going form of the species.

Keywords: adaptation; conservation genetics; fish; hybridization; natural selection and contemporary evolution; population genetics – empirical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Sampling scheme and population genetic analysis. (A–C) Locations where fish were sampled from California rivers. Cities and main stems of sampled tributaries are written in grey. Each marker represents a sampling location, where X's are historical and O's are contemporary, coloured according to the legend in (D). For some rivers, the exact historical sampling location is unknown (see Note S3). Grey bars indicate impassable barriers. (D) PCA analysis of genomic data with distinct colours and symbols indicating separate geographic populations and time periods. Hatchery populations are in grey. (E) Unsupervised ADMIXTURE (K = 3 clusters) analysis. Each bar represents an individual, and each colour represents a different ancestry assignment.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Isolation by distance and PCA suggest persistent North–South population structure. Isolation by distance calculated by the outgroup f3 statistic between all pairs of populations (black dots) and all pairs of individual trout (green circles for non‐hybrid pairs, orange circles for pairs that include at least one hybrid) in (A) historical populations and (B) contemporary populations. The best fit line, Pearson's correlation and Mantel test p‐value are calculated using data from all pairs of populations (N = 10, black dots). Jitter was added to the x‐axis of the green circles to improve visualisation. (C) A PCA of contemporary and historical steelhead populations after removing trout with suspected hatchery or cutthroat trout ancestry. The dashed line separates historical and contemporary samples, with populations largely mirrored across the line.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Contemporary steelhead show minimal hatchery introgression. (A) Diagram of D‐statistic topology and interpretation, where a positive D‐statistic indicates excess allele sharing between hatchery and contemporary populations, and a negative D‐statistic indicates excess allele sharing between hatchery and historical populations. Z‐scores > 3 are considered moderately significant, with Z‐scores > 6 highly significant. (B) D‐statistics for all five rivers, quantifying significance of introgression between historical or contemporary steelhead populations and any of the five hatchery strains. Z‐scores coloured according to (A).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Contemporary steelhead genomes show signs of adaptation and lost genetic diversity. (A) Comparison of the proportion of the Omy05 migration‐associated haplotype in historical and contemporary populations. R indicates the resident/rearranged haplotype, and A indicates the anadromous/ancestral haplotype. (B) Comparison of genomic diversity present in historical (dotted lines), contemporary (solid lines), and hatchery samples (solid grey lines). Contemporary and historical hatchery hybrids were not included in the analysis.

References

    1. Abadía‐Cardoso, A. , Brodsky A., Cavallo B., et al. 2019. “Anadromy Redux? Genetic Analysis to Inform Development of an Indigenous American River Steelhead Broodstock.” Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 10, no. 1: 137–147.
    1. Abadía‐Cardoso, A. , Pearse D. E., Jacobson S., et al. 2016. “Population Genetic Structure and Ancestry of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (<styled-content style="fixed-case"> Oncorhynchus mykiss </styled-content>) at the Extreme Southern Edge of Their Range in North America.” Conservation Genetics 17: 675–689.
    1. Alaçamlı, E. , Naidoo T., Güler M. N., et al. 2024. “READv2: Advanced and User‐Friendly Detection of Biological Relatedness in Archaeogenomics.” Genome Biology 25, no. 1: 216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander, D. H. , Novembre J., and Lange K.. 2009. “Fast Model‐Based Estimation of Ancestry in Unrelated Individuals.” Genome Research 19, no. 9: 1655–1664. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allendorf, F. W. , Leary R. F., Spruell P., and Wenburg J. K.. 2001. “The Problems With Hybrids: Setting Conservation Guidelines.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16, no. 11: 613–622.

LinkOut - more resources