Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients Managed With Organ Preservation Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer-A Historical Cohort Study
- PMID: 40891373
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.70309
Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients Managed With Organ Preservation Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer-A Historical Cohort Study
Abstract
Aim: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer improves oncological outcomes and organ preservation rates, but the impact on patient quality of life (QoL) is not known. This cohort study compares the quality of life (QoL) of post-TNT watch-and-wait (W&W) patients to a historical cohort of patients that underwent standard care.
Method: Patients managed with a W&W approach following a personalised TNT (pTNT W&W group) were compared with historical group patients who had undergone standard treatment but who would have been eligible for pTNT under our current protocol (STD group). Patients were sent three questionnaires to complete: Survey of International Delphi consensus definition for lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS) symptoms, EORTC-QLQ-CR29, and the LARS score.
Results: Questionnaires were completed for 29 of 41 patients in the pTNT W&W group, and 33 of 63 patients in the STD group (a response rate of 70.7% and 52.4%, respectively). Patients were well matched at baseline. The pTNT W&W group had significantly lower LARS rates (55.6% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.012) with fewer cases of major LARS (29.6% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.039). The pTNT W&W also had significantly improved QoL scores across several parameters of EORTC-QLQ-CR29 including stool frequency (20.7 vs. 30.8, p = 0.009), embarrassment regarding bowel symptoms (16.1 vs. 31.3, p = 0.018), and abdominal pain (5.8 vs. 14.1, p = 0.005).
Conclusions: Despite retaining the irradiated rectum, patients managed with organ preservation after TNT experience a higher QoL with much lower, but not absent, rates of bowel and bladder dysfunction.
Keywords: low anterior resection syndrome; pelvic floor; rectal cancer; total neoadjuvant therapy.
© 2025 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
References
-
- W. S. Bolton, S. J. Chapman, N. Corrigan, et al., “The Incidence of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome as Assessed in an International Randomized Controlled Trial (MRC/NIHR ROLARR),” Annals of Surgery 274 (2021): e1223–e1229.
-
- P. Christensen, C. Im Baeten, E. Espin‐Basany, et al., “Management Guidelines for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome—The MANUEL Project,” Colorectal Disease 23 (2021): 461–475.
-
- A. D. Croese, J. M. Lonie, A. F. Trollope, V. N. Vangaveti, and Y. H. Ho, “A Meta‐Analysis of the Prevalence of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Systematic Review of Risk Factors,” International Journal of Surgery 56 (2018): 234–241.
-
- C. L. C. Bryant, P. J. Lunniss, C. H. Knowles, M. A. Thaha, and C. L. H. Chan, “Anterior Resection Syndrome,” Lancet Oncology 13 (2012): e403–e408.
-
- C. Carvalho and R. Glynne‐Jones, “Challenges Behind Proving Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer,” Lancet Oncology 18 (2017): e354–e363.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
