Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of the SAFE Early Intervention in Infants at Risk: A Randomised Controlled Trial
- PMID: 40891629
- DOI: 10.1111/jpc.70191
Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of the SAFE Early Intervention in Infants at Risk: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Early intervention for infants at risk of cerebral palsy (CP) plays a critical role in improving neurodevelopmental outcomes. Recently, approaches emphasising infant active participation and family collaboration have shown greater effectiveness compared to traditional methods.
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the SAFE early intervention approach on cognitive, language, and motor development in infants at risk for CP, in comparison to conventional neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) practices.
Methods: In this randomised controlled trial, 46 infants were assigned to either the SAFE intervention group (n = 23) or the control group receiving NDT-based care (n = 23). The intervention lasted for 3 months, with developmental assessments conducted at 6 and 12 months using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III).
Results: Significant improvements were observed in motor and language composite scores in the SAFE group between baseline (T1) and the 3-month follow-up (T2), while cognitive scores showed a non-significant increase. Compared to the control group, the SAFE group demonstrated significantly higher scores across all Bayley-III domains at T2. However, the time × group interaction was significant in favour of the SAFE group for motor scores, while cognitive scores favoured the control group. No significant interaction was observed for language scores. Over time, both groups showed developmental progress in various domains, with the SAFE group exhibiting significant motor gains from T1 to T3. The control group showed significant cognitive improvements from T1 and T2 to T3.
Conclusions: The SAFE early intervention model appears to be a feasible and effective approach for infants at risk for CP, especially before a formal diagnosis is made. Its focus on active infant participation, family engagement, and enriched environments supports improved motor development outcomes.
Trial registration: NCT06930482.
Keywords: early intervention; enriched environment; infants at risk; physiotherapy.
© 2025 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians).
References
-
- J. A. Blackman, “Early Intervention: A Global Perspective,” Infants & Young Children 15, no. 2 (2002): 11–19.
-
- V. B. de Graaf‐Peters and M. Hadders‐Algra, “Ontogeny of the Human Central Nervous System: What Is Happening When?,” Early Human Development 82, no. 4 (2006): 257–266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.10.013.
-
- A. Spittle, J. Orton, L. W. Doyle, T. Tripathi, R. Boyd, and P. J. Anderson, “Early Developmental Intervention Programmes Provided Post Hospital Discharge to Prevent Motor and Cognitive Impairment in Preterm Infants,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2, no. 2 (2024): CD005495, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005495.pub5.
-
- C. H. Blauw‐Hospers and M. Hadders‐Algra, “A Systematic Review of the Effects of Early Intervention on Motor Development,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 47, no. 6 (2005): 421–432, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162205000827.
-
- S. N. Graven and J. V. Browne, “Sensory Development in the Fetus, Neonate, and Infant: Introduction and Overview,” Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews 8, no. 4 (2008): 169–172, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.nainr.2008.10.007.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
