Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Aug 21;57(1):195-204.
doi: 10.5114/ait/208016.

iPACK block with adductor canal block vs. lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial

Tomasz Reysner  1 , Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis  1 , Grzegorz Kowalski  1 , Lukasz Lapaj  2 , Przemyslaw Daroszewski  3 , Małgorzata Reysner
Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

iPACK block with adductor canal block vs. lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial

Tomasz Reysner et al. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. .
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with severe pain. We examined whether an ultrasound-guided, single-injection L2 erector spinae plane block could improve analgesia compared to an ultrasound-guided iPACK (infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block with adductor canal block (ACB) in patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia.

Material and methods: Ninety patients aged 65-89 years of both sexes (ASA I-III) scheduled for TKA were randomly allocated to receive iPACK block (ropivacaine 0.2%, 20 mL) with ACB (ropivacaine 0.2%, 10 mL), lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) (ropivacaine 0.2%, 20 mL on each side), or to the control group. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption. The secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to first rescue opioid analgesia, quadriceps muscle strength, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet- to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR).

Results: The total opioid consumption in 48 h was significantly lower in the iPACK+ACB group (mean ± SD) (3.0 ± 3.3) compared to L-ESPB (6.8 ± 3.8, P = 0.0442) and the control group (18.2 ± 4.0, P < 0.001). The time to first rescue opioid analgesia was longer in the iPACK+ACB (12.0 ± 1.9) compared to the L-ESPB (9.2 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) group and the control group (4.3 ± 1.1, P < 0.001). The pain scores, NLR, and PLR levels were significantly lower in the iPACK+ACB and L-ESPB groups than at all time points in the control group.

Conclusions: The iPACK+ACB is more effective than L-ESPB in pain management following TKA. iPACK+ACB and the L-ESPB lowered total opioid consumption and prolonged time to first opioid analgesia. NLR and PLR levels did not differ between the groups.

Keywords: adductor canal block; erector spinae plane block; iPACK block; knee arthroplasty; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; total.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources