Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Sep 2:96:656-663.
doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43907.

Similar femoral stem fixation but less metaphyseal loss of bone mineral density with a taper-wedge design and diaphyseal bone preservation with a long and round-tapered design: a 5-year randomized RSA and DXA study of 50 patients

Peter Bo Jørgensen  1 , Morten Homilius  2 , Daan Koppens  3 , Torben Bæk Hansen  4 , Maiken Stilling  5
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Similar femoral stem fixation but less metaphyseal loss of bone mineral density with a taper-wedge design and diaphyseal bone preservation with a long and round-tapered design: a 5-year randomized RSA and DXA study of 50 patients

Peter Bo Jørgensen et al. Acta Orthop. .

Abstract

Background and purpose: The new Tri-Lock bone -preserving stem with a collarless proximal-coated tapered-wedge design was compared with a classic well-proven collarless proximal-coated long and round-tapered design. Our primary aim was to compare femoral stem fixation (subsidence) of the Tri-Lock stem with the classic Summit stem, and secondarily to compare the change in periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) and PROMS between stem groups.

Methods: In a patient-blinded randomized controlled trial, 52 patients at mean age 60 (SD 6) received cementless Tri-Lock (n = 26) or Summit (n = 26) femoral stems with a cementless Pinnacle cup, a cross-linked polyethylene liner, and a CoCr head. Patients were followed for 5 years with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). We measured mean (CI) values of migration and periprosthetic bone mineral density and calculated between group differences.

Results: At 2-year follow-up, the mean difference in subsidence was 0.14 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.27 to 0.56) and below the chosen minimal clinically important difference of 0.6 mm. At 5-year follow-up, for the Tri-Lock and Summit stems, the mean subsidence was 0.38 (CI 0.04-0.72) and 0.24 (CI 0.09-0.57), and the mean retroversion was 1.68° (CI 0.80-2.55) and 1.53° (CI 0.68-2.37), respectively. There was initial periprosthetic BMD loss for both stems. At 5-year follow-up, the mean metaphyseal bone loss was minimal for the Tri-Lock stem (zone 1: -2.8% vs -11.5%) while the Summit stem preserved the medial diaphyseal bone better (zone 6: -7.1% vs -13.6%). At the medial stem tip, BMD was increased with the Summit stem (zone 5: +3.4% vs -1.5%). At 5-year follow-up, median EQ5D was 1 in both groups and median Oxford Hip Score was 47 (Tri-Lock) and 45 (Summit) with no statistical significant differences between groups.

Conclusion: The Tri-Lock and the Summit stems displayed similar migration until mid-term follow-up. At 3 months both stems had lost metaphyseal periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD). During the following years, the new design regained more metaphyseal BMD. Contrarily, the long and round-tapered stem design regained or even increased diaphyseal BMD. PROM scores improved beyond the reference level for both groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tri-Lock (A) and Summit (B) femoral stems.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consort flowchart.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Subsidence (negative Y-translation) and retroversion (positive Y-rotation) of the Tri-Lock and Summit femoral stems.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change in BMD (%) of the 7 Gruen zones from the postoperative DXA-scan for the Tri- Lock (blue line) and Summit (red line) stems.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Molli R G, Lombardi A V, Jr, Berend K R, Adams J B, Sneller M A. A short tapered stem reduces intraoperative complications in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(2): 450-61. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2068-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thien T M, Chatziagorou G, Garellick G, Furnes O, Havelin L I, Mäkelä K, et al. Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the nordic arthroplasty register association database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96(19): e167. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.M.00643. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Changoor A, Suderman R P, Alshaygy I, Fuhrmann A, Akens M K, Safir O, et al. Irregular porous titanium enhances implant stability and bone ingrowth in an intra-articular ovine model. J Orthop Res 2022; 40(10): 2294-307. doi: 10.1002/jor.25272. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Merle C, Streit M R, Volz C, Pritsch M, Gotterbarm T, Aldinger P R. Bone remodeling around stable uncemented titanium stems during the second decade after total hip arthroplasty: a DXA study at 12 and 17 years. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22(11): 2879-86. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1483-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burchard R, Graw J A, Soost C, Schmitt J. Stress shielding effect after total hip arthroplasty varies between combinations of stem design and stiffness: a comparing biomechanical finite element analysis. International Orthopaedics 2023; 47(8): 1981-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05825-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources