Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Aug 27;9(9):e24.00315.
doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00315. eCollection 2025 Sep 1.

Reporting the Pooled Last Follow-up Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score Underestimates Functional Improvements Seen Over Time

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Reporting the Pooled Last Follow-up Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score Underestimates Functional Improvements Seen Over Time

Alysia K Kemp et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. .

Abstract

Introduction: The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score is the most commonly used functional outcome tool in Orthopaedic Oncology. However, there are no published recommendations on how to collect, analyze, and report these data. To address this knowledge gap, we performed (1) a systematic review to analyze the methodology of reporting MSTS scores and (2) an analysis of two different reporting methods (pooled last follow-up versus longitudinal time based).

Methods: The mean MSTS score and length of follow-up were calculated using data provided in articles included in the systematic review. Paired t-tests were used to compare mean MSTS scores calculated at standardized postoperative intervals versus mean MSTS scores calculated from last follow-up time points using prospectively collected data from a single institutional database.

Results: More than 300 articles met inclusion criteria. Most authors reported a single pooled score calculated from MSTS scores obtained at the patients' last follow-up visits (91.6%, n = 356). When comparing this method (pooled reporting) versus longitudinal time-based reporting, the pooled MSTS scores were only comparable to the MSTS scores at the 6-month postoperative visit. The pooled last follow-up scores underestimated MSTS scores obtained after 6 months (P < 0.0001 at 1 year and P = 0.0047 at 3 years). Improvements were seen in the MSTS domains after the 6-month visit (average time to stability was 1.8 years).

Conclusion: The most common historical method of reporting MSTS scores, the pooled last follow-up method, underestimates functional improvements observed during long-term follow-up. Longitudinal time-based reporting provides more accurate representation of the functional outcomes over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the following authors or any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article: Dr. Kemp, Dr. Nalty, Dr. McChesney, Dr. Geng, Dr. Patel, Dr. Lewis, and Dr. Bird.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart showing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis details of the number of articles identified, included, and excluded.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphical representation showing how MSTS93 scores were collected at standardized postoperative intervals. MSTS = Musculoskeletal Tumor Society
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graphical representation showing the pooled MSTS93 score calculated from values obtained at the patient's last follow-up visit. MSTS = Musculoskeletal Tumor Society
Figure 4
Figure 4
Graph showing the primary diagnoses for patients treated for impending or pathologic long bone fractures.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Graph showing the mean MSTS 93 lower extremity score at standardized preoperative (1) and postoperative intervals at 2 weeks (2), 6 weeks (3), 3 months (4), 6 months (5), 1 year (6), 2 years (7), 3 years (8), 4 years (9), 5 years (10), 6 years (11), 7 years (12), and pooled last follow-up (14). MSTS = Musculoskeletal Tumor Society

References

    1. Bolia IK, Savvidou OD, Kang HP, et al. : Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) for musculoskeletal sarcoma patients in Greece. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2021;31:1631-1638. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ: A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;286:241-246. - PubMed
    1. Iwata S, Uehara K, Ogura K, et al. : Reliability and validity of a Japanese-language and culturally adapted version of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system for the lower extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016;474:2044-2052. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Janssen SJ, van Rein EAJ, Paulino Pereira NR, et al. : The discrepancy between patient and clinician reported function in extremity bone metastases. Sarcoma 2016;2016:1-6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uehara K, Ogura K, Akiyama T, et al. : Reliability and validity of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system for the upper extremity in Japanese patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475:2253-2259. - PMC - PubMed