Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 2;43(1):528.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05899-5.

War-related urological trauma in Israel: a retrospective national registry analysis

Husny Mahmud  1   2 , Yoram Mor  3   4 , Adi Givon  5 , Noam Kitrey  3   4 ; Israel Trauma Group (ITG)
Collaborators, Affiliations

War-related urological trauma in Israel: a retrospective national registry analysis

Husny Mahmud et al. World J Urol. .

Abstract

Background: Urological trauma significantly affects patient morbidity, functional outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization. This study evaluated war-related genitourinary (GU) injuries that occurred during the Israeli-Gaza War, with a focus on injury patterns, management, and clinical outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis utilizing the Israeli National Trauma Registry, which is managed by the Gertner Institute for Health Policy and Epidemiology. This registry captures data on all of the patients admitted to trauma centers in Israel. Data quality is maintained through ongoing training of data abstractors and regular audits of registry data. All documented hospitalizations from October 7, 2023, to May 31, 2024, were included, excluding noncombat-related injuries. GU injuries were classified by anatomical location into the upper urinary tract (kidney/ureter), lower urinary tract (bladder/urethra), and external genitalia (penis/scrotum/testes). The data collected included demographics, injury mechanisms, injury severity score (ISS), surgical management, and clinical outcomes (ICU admissions, hospital length of stay [LOS], rehabilitation needs, and mortality). GU patients were compared with non-GU patients.

Results: Of the 2,422 total casualties, 117 (4.8%) sustained GU injuries. The mean age was 27.2 ± 9.2 years (range 14-76) in the GU-injured casualty group versus 30.1 ± 15.1 years (range 0-97) in the non-GU casualty group; the difference was not significant (p = 0.43), with 97.4% males. Explosive devices (59.0%) and gunshot wounds (36.8%) were the predominant injury mechanisms. Severe injuries (ISS ≥ 16) occurred significantly more frequently among GU-injured patients (61.5% vs. 21.6%, p < 0.0001). External genital injuries were the most common injuries (60.7%), followed by kidney (27.4%) and bladder damage (10.3%). Associated pelvic fractures occurred in 18% of the GU trauma patients versus 1.8% of the non-GU-injured patients (p < 0.0001). Surgical interventions were performed in 84.6% of the patients, among whom scrotal/testicular surgeries (27.4%) were most common. ICU admissions (44.4%), prolonged hospitalizations ≥ 14 days (41.4%), rehabilitation needs (53.0%), and mortality (6.8%) were significantly greater among GU-injured patients.

Conclusions: War-related GU trauma, although relatively uncommon, involves severe injuries, extensive surgical management, prolonged hospitalizations, and substantial rehabilitation demands. Enhancements in protective equipment and multidisciplinary treatment strategies are critical for optimizing outcomes in future conflicts.

Keywords: Explosive injuries; Gunshot wounds; Rehabilitation; Trauma surgery; Urological trauma; War injuries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Chaim Sheba Medical Center Institutional Review Board (Approval SMC 5138–18). The requirement for individual patient consent was waived by the Chaim Sheba Medical Center Institutional Review Board due to the retrospective design of the study and the use of de-identified data. The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable.

References

    1. Serkin FB, Soderdahl DW, Hernandez J, Patterson M, Blackbourne L, Wade CE (2010) Combat urologic trauma in US military overseas contingency operations. J Trauma 69(Suppl 1):S175–S178. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e44a75 - PubMed
    1. Hudak SJ, Morrison JJ, Caruso J et al (2013) Combat urological trauma in US service members during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom: early findings and impact of injury mechanism. J Urol 189:1362–1368. 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.051
    1. Aydın A, Özbay E, Durmuş E, Öncel HF, Karlıdağ İ, Salar R, Sönmez MG (2021) Management of war-related genitourinary injuries. J Urol Surg 8:212–216. 10.4274/jus.galenos.2021.0029
    1. Soderdahl DW, Serkin FB, Blackbourne LH et al (2010) The impact of body armor on the management of modern combat urologic trauma. J Trauma 69(Suppl 1):S179–S183. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e44a69 - PubMed
    1. Morey AF (2013) Genitourinary trauma in the modern battlefield: bullet and blast injuries. In: Koraitim M (ed) Trauma in Urology. Springer, London, pp 153–165

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources