Psoriatic arthritis incidence and prevalence trajectory in Poland-public-payer, national-level, long-term data
- PMID: 40892253
- PMCID: PMC12405396
- DOI: 10.1007/s00296-025-05966-5
Psoriatic arthritis incidence and prevalence trajectory in Poland-public-payer, national-level, long-term data
Abstract
To estimate the actual incidence and prevalence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) within a 9-year timeframe in Poland. Patients were defined as having PsA if they had at least two visits more than 90 days apart with ICD-10 codes M07.0, M07.1, M07.2, M07.3, or L40.5 and filled at least one reimbursed prescription for peripheral or axial PsA-specific treatments during this period (including methotrexate, sulfasalazine, ciclosporin, leflunomide, biologics, targeted synthetic drugs, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Data was obtained from the nationwide public payer database, considering gender, age, and region of residence. We observed an incidence rate of 1.1 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2021, compared to 13.2 in 2013. Regarding the age of the first diagnosis, the peak incidence rate decreased, with a more pronounced decline in men. The prevalence of PsA rose from 72.5 individuals per 100,000 in 2013 to 95.5 in 2021, representing approximately 0.1% of the total population in Poland, with a significant predominance of women among patients over 55 years of age. The decline in PsA incidence may be influenced by a strict case definition and improved access to treatment. Higher prevalence in older women suggests potential gender-related differences. The lower peak incidence and younger diagnosis age in men raise questions about whether lower PsA prevalence in older males is linked to higher mortality due to longer disease duration and comorbidities. Further research is needed to clarify these findings.
Keywords: Administrative data; Epidemiology; Incidence; Prevalence; Psoriatic arthritis; Public health.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Ethical approval: This analysis relies solely on data obtained from the National Health Fund (NFZ) electronic databases. Obtaining institutional ethical approval was not required.
Figures
References
-
- Cakır N, Pamuk ÖN, Derviş E, Imeryüz N, Uslu H, Benian Ö, Elelçi E, Erdem G, Sarvan FO, Senocak M (2012) The prevalences of some rheumatic diseases in Western Turkey: Havsa study. Rheumatol Int 32:895–908. 10.1007/s00296-010-1699-4 - PubMed
-
- Hanova P, Pavelka K, Holcatova I, Pikhart H (2010) Incidence and prevalence of psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and reactive arthritis in the first descriptive population-based study in the Czech Republic. Scand J Rheumatol 39:310–317. 10.3109/03009740903544212 - PubMed
-
- Ogdie A, Weiss P (2015) The epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 4:545–568. 10.1016/j.rdc.2015.07.001
-
- Stolwijk C, van Onna M, Boonen A, van Tubergen A (2016) Global prevalence of spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 68:1320–1331. 10.1002/acr.22831 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
