Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 2:1-17.
doi: 10.1159/000548260. Online ahead of print.

Managing the involved recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid cancer

Managing the involved recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid cancer

Tse Kiat Soong et al. Oncology. .

Abstract

Background: Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (RLNP) is not uncommon after thyroid surgery and can be debilitating. This is a retrospective cohort analysis of outcomes in patients with RLNP post-thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid malignancy.

Method: Clinicopathological details as well as outcomes of thyroidectomies for differentiated thyroid cancer in 862 patients performed over a period of 22 years (2001-2023) for nerve palsy were collected. The patients were stratified into two groups based on whether the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) was amputated or preserved.

Results: Of the 1520 nerves in 862 patients at risk during thyroidectomy, a total of 71 (8.2%) (20M:51F) patients, with a median age of 54 (range: 19 - 83) suffered RLNP, which was temporary in 14 (1.6%), unilateral in 51 (5.9%) and bilateral in 6 (0.7%) patients. The RLN was amputated in 31 of 62 patients (50%). In 29 of 71(41%) patients the nerve was intentionally sacrificed due to gross disease infiltration while the RLN was inadvertently severed during dissection in 2 (3%) patients. Among cases with recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) transection, only five underwent primary repair or ansa cervicalis to RLN anastomosis. The only factor associated with amputation of the RLN was a larger tumour size (40.4 vs 24.7mm, p = 0.007). Preservation of voice quality was higher in the shave group in comparison to the amputation group ((93.5% vs 71.0%, p = 0.0426).

Conclusion: Preservation of nerve or reconstruction in transectional injuries should be considered where possible to improve voice outcomes except in cases when the laryngotracheal complex is involved.

PubMed Disclaimer