Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 15:56:101412.
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101412. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Uptake, positivity, and equity of online postal self-sampling for chlamydia testing in England: a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Uptake, positivity, and equity of online postal self-sampling for chlamydia testing in England: a retrospective cohort study

Alison Howarth et al. Lancet Reg Health Eur. .

Abstract

Background: Chlamydia is the most commonly reported sexually transmitted infection (STI) in Europe and untreated chlamydia is associated with poor health outcomes. Online postal self-sampling enables people to test for STIs including chlamydia without having to visit a health-care provider, but the extent to which the addition of this mode of testing in England has impacted access to testing in different populations is unclear. In England, there is national-level surveillance data enabling identification of the factors associated with use of online postal self-sampling (OPSS) for chlamydia testing. The aim of this analysis was to determine the change in chlamydia testing, chlamydia positivity, and test location as a result of the introduction of OPSS, and to determine socio-demographic factors associated with uptake of OPSS services compared to testing in-person.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study analysing data on all publicly funded chlamydia tests between 01/01/2015 and 31/12/2022 in England using two pseudonymised national surveillance systems (GUMCAD STI Surveillance System and CTAD Chlamydia Surveillance System) for STIs. We conducted a descriptive analysis of 25,171,919 chlamydia tests to establish the uptake and positivity of chlamydia tests by testing mode and gender over time. We used bivariate and multivariable logistic regression to examine associations of uptake of testing and positivity of tests with sociodemographic characteristics and testing by OPSS or a different mode.

Findings: The overall number of chlamydia tests/quarter (OPSS and in-person) gradually increased over time until 2019 (884,843 tests/quarter in quarter 1) and then declined in early 2020 (376,118 in quarter 2) and had not returned to 2019 levels by the end of 2022 (715,166 in quarter 4). During this time, the proportion of OPSS testing completed through OPSS increased from 2.6% (88,144/3,433,987) in 2015 to 38.4% (1,168,828/2,972,226) in 2022. Women were less likely than men to use OPSS compared to all available in-person testing (aOR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.75-0.75)). Those aged 20-24 were more likely to use OPSS than 15-19-year-olds (aOR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.55-1.56) and use of OPSS then decreased with increasing age. People in the most deprived areas were the least likely to use OPSS (aORs 1.18-1.28 for index of multiple deprivation quintile groups 2-5 vs 1). People were less likely to test positive using OPSS compared to in-person testing (aOR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.87-0.88). Between 2015 and 2022 OPSS chlamydia test-positivity decreased from 9.3% (2551/27,557) to 7.5% (34,050/454,596) in men and 7.4% (4458/60,367) to 6.1% (43,088/702,867) in women. During the same period, chlamydia test-positivity in sexual health services increased from 8.2% (57,139/692,873) to 10.6% (43,061/406,161) in men and 6.4% (51,080/797,143) to 7.9% (33,292/420,760) in women.

Interpretation: We have found changes in access to care, with a shift towards testing via OPSS, and variations in who tests where and differences in positivity by testing mode and gender. Further research is needed to ensure available testing pathways meet the needs of all populations.

Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Keywords: Chlamydia; Digital health; Online STI testing; Public health; STI service provision; STIs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following authors declare competing interests: FB has received speakers' fees and an institutional grant from Gilead Sciences Ltd., as well as other institutional grants from the NIHR. JG has received institutional grants from the NIHR.; JS is co-chair of the BASHH bacterial STI special interest group and has received travel support from BHIVA & BASHH for meetings associated with this work. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mode of chlamydia testing and diagnosis, by gender and year. Brackets along the X axis indicate: The first national lockdown (late March 2020–June 2020) occurred in 2020 Q2; local lockdowns (September 2020–November 2020) occurred during 2020 Q3 to 2020 Q4; and the second national lockdown (January 2021–July 2021) occurred mainly in 2021 Q1 and 2021 Q2.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Chlamydia test positivity, by mode§, gender and year. § Other in-person testing services include community sexual and reproductive health services, general practice, pharmacy, termination of pregnancy and other free in-person testing services. Brackets along the X axis indicate years disrupted by COVID-19.

References

    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) STI cases continue to rise across Europe. 2025 news story. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/news-events/sti-cases-continue-rise-across...
    1. UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Sexually transmitted infections and screening for chlamydia in England: 2022 report. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/sexually-transmitted-infections...
    1. UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Sexually transmitted infections and screening for chlamydia in England: 2023 report. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/sexually-transmitted-infections...
    1. Alexious Z.W., Hoenderboom B.M., Hoebe C.J.P.A., et al. Reproductive tract complication risks following Chlamydia trachomatis infections: a long-term prospective cohort study from 2008 to 2022. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024;45 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tiller C.M. Chlamydia during pregnancy: implications and impact on perinatal and neonatal outcomes. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31(1):93–98. - PubMed