Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2025 Aug 22:rs.3.rs-7320100.
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7320100/v1.

Virtual Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Wei Wu  1 , Priyansh Patel  1 , Parth Vikram Singh  1 , Shijia Zhao  1 , Yash Vardhan Trivedi  1 , Rahul Chikatimalla  1 , Abdulkader Shaar  1 , Sree Sindhu Vijayarao  1 , Varsha Miriyala  1 , Muhammad Fiyaz Alam  1 , Parth Munjal  1 , Rakshita Ramesh Bhat  1 , Kanishka Goswami  1 , Changkye Lee  1 , Ioanna Chatzizisi  1 , Emmanouil S Brilakis  2 , George Dangas  3 , Shahbaz Malik  4 , Aleem Siddique  4 , Yiannis Chatzizisis  1
Affiliations

Virtual Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Wei Wu et al. Res Sq. .

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) offers superior long-term survival over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or medical therapy in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD). This prospective proof-of-concept study aims to develop and validate a non-invasive computational platform that integrates coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to predict post-CABG hemodynamics, including virtual grafting and fractional flow reserve (FFR) estimation. Four patients with stable multi-vessel CAD undergoing elective CABG were included. Pre-CABG CCTA was used for 3D reconstruction of coronary anatomy. Virtual bypass grafting was performed using both patient-specific graft sizes, derived from post-operative imaging and mixed-specificity graft sizes using patient-specific LIMA and standardized non-LIMA graft sizes, derived from population averages. CFD simulations were used to estimate post-CABG FFR and validated against invasive FFR measurements. Computational FFR showed strong correlation with invasive FFR (patient-specific: r2 = 0.92; mixed-specificity: r2 = 0.88). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated minimal bias (patient-specific: 0.006 ± 0.027; mixed-specificity: -0.007 ± 0.029). Agreement with invasive FFR was 90% for patient-specific grafts (κ = 0.74, p = 0.016) and 80% for mixed-specificity grafts (κ = 0.41, p = 0.107). This virtual CABG model represents a significant advancement over existing non-invasive systems by accurately predicting post-operative hemodynamics and FFR, offering potential to optimize graft strategies and reduce reliance on invasive FFR. Future studies should explore clinical integration and large-scale validation to enhance CABG surgical planning and improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: Computational Fluid Dynamics; Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; Fractional Flow Reserve; Virtual Grafting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Yiannis S. Chatzizisis: Speaker honoraria, advisory board fees, and research grant from Boston Scientific Inc.; Advisory board fees and research grant from Medtronic Inc.; Issued U.S. patent (No. 11,026,749) and international patent pending (application No. PCT/US2020/057304) for the invention entitled “Computational simulation platform for the planning of interventional procedures”; Co-founder of ComKardia Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Virtual CABG platform for 3D reconstruction Illustrates the workflow for the study design; CABG: Coronary artery bypass grafting; CFD: Computational fluid dynamics
Figure 2
Figure 2
3D reconstructed stenosis in the native model Shows the pre-CABG 3D-reconstructed stenoses for all arteries; RCA: Right coronary artery; LAD: Left anterior descending artery; LCX: Left circumflex artery
Figure 3
Figure 3
Anatomical comparison of patient specific and mixed-specificity 3D reconstruction Provides an anatomical comparison of 3D reconstruction between the patient-specific and mixed-specificity graft sizes for all cases; RCA: Right coronary artery; LAD: Left anterior descending artery; LCX: Left circumflex artery; rPDA: Right posterior descending artery; D1: Diagonal artery; SVG: Saphenous venous graft; LIMA: Left internal mammary artery
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparative CFD analysis between patient specific and mixed-specificity graft 3D reconstruction Shows comparison between invasive FFR and computational FFR; RCA: Right coronary artery; LAD: Left anterior descending artery; LCX: Left circumflex artery; rPDA: Right posterior descending artery; D1: Diagonal artery; OM: Obtuse marginal; SVG: Saphenous venous graft; LIMA: Left internal mammary artery
Figure 5
Figure 5
Simple linear regression curves between invasive and computational FFR Illustrates simple linear regression curves between invasive and computational FFR; FFR: Fractional flow reserve
Figure 6
Figure 6
BA analysis of difference versus average between invasive and computational FFR. Illustrates BA analysis plots between invasive and computational FFR; FFR: Fractional flow reserve
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Doenst T. et al. PCI and CABG for treating stable coronary artery disease: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 73, 964–976 (2019). - PubMed
    1. Lawton J. S. et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 79, e21–e129 (2022). - PubMed
    1. Botman C. J. et al. Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve–guided study. Ann Thorac Surg. 83, 2093–2097 (2007). - PubMed
    1. Roh J.-H. et al. Fate of grafts bypassing nonischemic versus ischemic inducing coronary stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 122, 1148–1154 (2018). - PubMed
    1. Wu W. et al. Patient-specific computational simulation of coronary artery bypass grafting. PLoS One. 18, e0281423 (2023). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources