This is a preprint.
Application of Evidence into Practice in Trauma: The Purpose to Practice (P2P) Approach to Consensus Generation
- PMID: 40894154
- PMCID: PMC12393620
- DOI: 10.1101/2025.08.20.25334072
Application of Evidence into Practice in Trauma: The Purpose to Practice (P2P) Approach to Consensus Generation
Abstract
Introduction: In trauma care, there is a need to increase communication to ensure evidence-informed, best practice care guidelines are easily accessible to all providers to yield continuity of care. Clinical guidance use is one way to address this need while employing a patient-centered team approach.
Methods: During year two of the Design for Implementation: The Future of Trauma Research & Clinical Guidance conference series, participants gathered in person and virtually to further develop the Minimum Viable Product (MVP) created during year one. Professional facilitators used the purpose-to-practice (P2P) framework to help structure and guide further consensus building.
Results: Seventy in-person and up to 65 virtual attendees participated. Sixty-five responses were collected on the MVP reflection and initial feedback survey. Themes were developed surrounding the pillars of "Purpose," "Principles," "Participants," and "Practices" while looking at the "Structure" for "Sustainability." The "Purpose" pillar addressed the importance of rigorous, standardized implementation guidance. "Principles" exemplified the necessity of a collaborative approach and included all relevant stakeholders. Similarly, the central theme emphasized by the "Participants" pillar was the inclusiveness of all members of the trauma team. "Practices" dove into the deliverables of the initiative, including up-to-date decision-making support and logistics regarding guidance storage, management, and maintenance. Regarding "Structure," the most highly ranked idea was developing a steering committee whose purpose would be primarily to prioritize strategic initiatives.
Discussion: Clinical guidance needs to be current and readily available to all providers. Next steps of this initiative include developing a steering committee and subcommittees to sustain momentum.
Keywords: clinical practice guidance; minimum viable product; purpose-to-practice; trauma.
Conflict of interest statement
Katheryn Grider, Ashley Moreno, and Lacey LaGrone report funding for the DFI conference was made possible in part by grant 1R13HS028940-01A1 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) paid to the Coalition for National Trauma Research. The AHRQ grant covered part of their costs for attending the conference. Ashley Moreno received financial support from The ReSource, LLC for additional DFI conference support. The Coalition for National Trauma Research has received a grant from the Gates Foundation to support the ongoing and adjacent DFI work. Within the 2025 Design for Implementation (DFI) Authorship Group: Babak Sarani is a consultant for Haemonetics, Belmont, and Acumed, and a speaker for Haemonetics, Acumed, and Medtronic. Deborah M. Stein is a consultant for CSL Behring. Erik Van Eaton is a paid employee and shareowner at TransformativeMed Inc. (a health IT software company). Evert Eriksson is a speaker and educator for J&J and AO. Simon Oczkowski has received travel support from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, and consulting fees from VitalAire and The Brain Trauma Foundation. Kristan Staudenmayer is a consultant for AIMedica and Credence Management Solutions. Jeffrey L. Wells and Kelly Lang each received a stipend for their DFI conference participation as trauma survivors/a caregiver from the ReSource, LLC. Elliott R. Haut reports research funding from AHRQ, PCORI, NIH/NHLBI. Dr. Haut is also the Editor of Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open (TSACO). Simon Oczkowski has received travel support from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, and consulting fees from VitalAire and The Brain Trauma Foundation.
Figures
References
-
- Panteli D, Legido-Quigley H, Reichebner C, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines as a quality strategy. In: Busse R, Klazinga N, Panteli D, et al. , editors. Improving healthcare quality in Europe: Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies [Internet]. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019. (Health Policy Series, No. 53.) 9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549283/ - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous