Preoperative strategies to prevent periprosthetic joint infection after knee replacement: evidence-based recommendations for multidisciplinary practice
- PMID: 40894246
- PMCID: PMC12399268
- DOI: 10.52965/001c.143566
Preoperative strategies to prevent periprosthetic joint infection after knee replacement: evidence-based recommendations for multidisciplinary practice
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe and challenging complication following joint replacement that significantly impacts patient outcomes and implant longevity. Various factors contribute to PJI onset, including patient-related comorbidities and surgical procedures. Preventive strategies are categorized into preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative measures. Preoperative risk factors can be classified as general or local. General ones include comorbidity management (metabolic disorder, rheumatic and inflammatory diseases), nutritional optimization, weight control, bacterial decolonization, and lifestyle modifications. Local factors involve avoiding intra-articular injections before surgery and assessing previous knee interventions, in addition to implementing preoperative physiotherapy and ensuring proper skin preparation. Preoperative patient optimization significantly improves outcomes following knee replacement by reducing PJI risk, as well as hospital stays and recovery times. Implementing standardized, evidence-based preoperative strategies can enhance surgical success and long-term implant survival. Multidisciplinary collaboration between surgeons, general practitioners, and healthcare providers is essential to minimize infection risks and improve patient outcomes following joint replacement. This paper focuses on preoperative optimization, highlighting evidence-based recommendations to minimize the risk of PJI in patients undergoing knee replacement.
Keywords: Periprosthetic joint infection; bacterial decolonization; joint replacement; knee replacement; prevention.
References
-
- Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010. Cram P., Lu X., Kates S. L., Singh J. A., Li Y., Wolf B. R. Sep 26;2012 JAMA. 308(12):1227–36. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11153. https://doi.org/10.1001/2012.jama.11153 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Apr;2007 J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89(4):780–5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00222 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- The lifetime risk of total hip and knee arthroplasty: results from the UK general practice research database. Culliford D. J., Maskell J., Kiran A., Judge A., Javaid M. K., Cooper C., Arden N. K. Jun;2012 Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 20(6):519–24. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.636 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Periprosthetic joint infections: state-of-the-art. Gehrke T., Citak M., Parvizi J., Budhiparama N. C., Akkaya M. Dec 18;2024 Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 145(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05627-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05627-5 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Revision total knee arthroplasty infection: incidence and predictors. Mortazavi S. M., Schwartzenberger J., Austin M. S., Purtill J. J., Parvizi J. Aug;2010 Clin Orthop Relat Res. 468(8):2052–9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1308-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1308-6 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
