Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 15:16:1601385.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1601385. eCollection 2025.

Chimeric anti-HLA antibody receptor engineered human regulatory T cells suppress alloantigen-specific B cells from pre-sensitized transplant recipients

Affiliations

Chimeric anti-HLA antibody receptor engineered human regulatory T cells suppress alloantigen-specific B cells from pre-sensitized transplant recipients

Jaime Valentín-Quiroga et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Organ transplantation is a lifesaving procedure, with 50,000 transplants happening every year in the United States. However, many patients harbor antibodies and B cells directed against allogeneic human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules, notably HLA-A2, greatly decreasing their likelihood of receiving a compatible organ. Moreover, antibody-mediated rejection is a significant contributor to chronic transplant rejection. Current strategies to desensitize patients non-specifically target circulating antibodies and B cells, resulting in poor efficacy and complications. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are immune cells dedicated to suppressing specific immune responses by interacting with both innate and adaptive immune cells. Here, we genetically modified human Tregs with a chimeric anti-HLA antibody receptor (CHAR) consisting of an extracellular HLA-A2 protein fused to a CD28-CD3zeta intracellular signaling domain, driving Treg activation upon recognition of anti-HLA-A2 antibodies on the surface of alloreactive B cells. We find that HLA-A2 CHAR Tregs get activated specifically by anti-HLA-A2 antibody-producing cells. Of note, HLA-A2 CHAR activation does not negatively affect Treg stability, as measured by expression of the Treg lineage transcription factors FOXP3 and HELIOS. Interestingly, HLA-A2 CHAR Tregs are not cytotoxic towards anti-HLA-A2 antibody-producing cells, unlike HLA-A2 CHAR modified conventional CD4+ T cells. Importantly, HLA-A2 CHAR Tregs recognize and significantly suppress high affinity IgG antibody production by B cells from HLA-A2 sensitized patients. Altogether, our results provide proof-of-concept of a new strategy to specifically inhibit alloreactive B cells to desensitize transplant recipients.

Keywords: B cells; HLA sensitization; antibody production; engineered immune receptors; human immunology; regulatory T cells; transplant rejection; transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A provisional patent application based on the work reported here has been submitted by JV-Q and LF. LF is an inventor and has received royalties from patents on engineered cell therapies, is a consultant with GuidePoint Global and McKesson, and is the founder and CEO of Torpedo Bio. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HLA-A2 CHAR Tregs are activated specifically by anti-HLA-A2 antibody producing cells. (A) Schematic representation of chimeric anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody receptor (CHAR) featuring a CD28-CD3zeta signaling domain, expressed on the surface of a human regulatory T cell (Treg), binding an anti-HLA-A2 antibody on the surface of an allogeneic B cell from an HLA-A2 pre-sensitized patient. The B cell receptor (BCR) on the surface of the B cell comprises a surface-bound antibody and the signaling heterodimer CD79A and CD79B. Upon engagement, the HLA-A2 CHAR Treg suppresses anti-HLA-A2 expressing B cell function. (B) Cell surface expression of HLA-A2 CHAR construct in lentivirus transduced Tregs, as assessed by co-expression of HLA-A2 and a reporter gene, truncated nerve growth factor receptor (NGFRt), linked to the CHAR gene by a 2A peptide. UT, untransduced. (C) CHAR Treg activation upon 48-hour co-incubation with irradiated PA2.1 (anti-HLA-A2), but not alone or with IVA12 (anti-HLA-DR, DP, DQ) hybridoma cells, as assessed by surface expression of CD69. (D) Frequency of CD69-expressing cells among UT or CHAR Tregs alone or co-incubated with PA2.1 or IVA12 cells for 48h. (E) Expression levels (MFI, median fluorescence intensity) of CD71 on UT or CHAR Tregs alone or co-incubated with PA2.1 or IVA12 cells for 48h. (F) Expression levels (MFI) of CD25 on UT or CHAR Tregs alone or co-incubated with PA2.1 or IVA12 cells for 48h. (G) Enrichment of CHAR-expressing Tregs upon 9-day co-incubation with irradiated PA2.1 cells, but not alone or with IVA12 cells, as assessed by surface expression of NGFRt reporter. (H) Frequency of NGFRt-expressing Tregs (CHAR Tregs) alone or co-incubated with PA2.1 or IVA12 cells for 9 days. For (D–F, H), bars represent mean and standard deviation (n = 3 technical replicates, one blood donor representative of two). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
HLA-A2 CHAR Tregs remain stable and are not cytotoxic upon activation. (A) Representative flow cytometry analysis of CHAR Treg FOXP3 and HELIOS expression after 9 days of co-culture with irradiated PA2.1 (anti-HLA-A2) and IVA12 (anti-HLA-DR, DP, DQ) hybridoma cells. Untransduced (UT) T effector (Teff) cells and CHAR Teff cells were used as negative controls. (B) Frequency of FOXP3+ CHAR Tregs alone or co-cultured with PA2.1 and IVA12 hybridoma cells for 9 days. (C) FOXP3 expression (mean fluorescence intensity - MFI) in CHAR Tregs alone or co-cultured with PA2.1 and IVA12 hybridoma cells for 9 days. (D) Frequency of FOXP3+HELIOS+ CHAR Tregs alone or co-cultured with irradiated PA2.1 and IVA12 hybridoma cells for 9 days. (E) Cytotoxicity of CHAR Tregs and CHAR Teff cells towards PA2.1, as measured by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release after 24-hour co-incubation at a 1:1 ratio. Bars in (B–E) represent mean and standard deviation (n = 3 technical replicates, one blood donor representative of two). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
HLA-A2 CHAR Tregs suppress IgG specific production on highly pre sensitized patients. (A) HLA-A2 sensitized patient (SEN) and healthy control (HD) demographics and clinical characteristics. (B) Experimental design for assessing CHAR Treg function in the presence of HLA-A2 pre-sensitized patient cells. HLA-A2 sensitized donor-derived peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were co-incubated with HLA-A2-expressing K562 cells to induce expansion of anti-HLA-A2 B cells and anti-HLA-A2 IgG antibody production. If CHAR Tregs are added, a decrease in antibody production elicited by exposure to HLA-A2 is expected. (C) IgG antibody production 48 hours or 5 days after pre-sensitized patient PBMC co-incubation with HLA-A2-K562 in the presence or absence of CHAR T regs, as assessed by ELISA. n=3 sensitized patients (SEN) and n=1 healthy donor (HD) control). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
HLA-A2 CHAR Tregs were activated and reduced the frequency of total B cells in pre-sensitized patient peripheral blood samples. (A) Flow cytometry gating strategy to identify HLA-A2+NGFR+CD19- CHAR Tregs, CD19+CD20+ B cells, and B cell subsets in co-cultures of sensitized patient PBMCs with irradiated HLA-A2-K562 and CHAR Tregs. (B, D) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) representation of sensitized patient PBMCs with irradiated HLA-A2-K562 (iA2K562) and CHAR Tregs depicting naive, marginal zone, memory and IgD-CD27- B cells, as well as plasmablasts, after 48 hours (B) and 5 days (D) of co-culture. (C, E) Frequency of CD27 expression and CD38 expression, as well as CD71 surface expression levels, in CHAR Tregs co-incubated with sensitized patient PBMCs for 48 hours (C) and 5 days (E). n=3 sensitized patients (SEN) and n=1 healthy donor (HD) control. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.

Update of

Similar articles

References

    1. Boenink R, Kramer A, Tuinhout RE, Savoye E, Asberg A, Idrizi A, et al. Trends in kidney transplantation rate across Europe: study from the ERA Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2023) 38:1528–39. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac333, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) and Organización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT) . Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation, International Report on Organ Donation and Transplantation Activities (2022). Available at: https://www.transplant-observatory.org/
    1. Li Q, Lan P. Activation of immune signals during organ transplantation. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2023) 8:110. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01377-9, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Au E, Wong G, Chapman JR. Cancer in kidney transplant recipients. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2018) 14:508–20. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0022-6, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruiz R, Kirk AD. Long-Term Toxicity of Immunosuppressive Therapy. In: Busuttil RW, Klintmalm GBG, editors. Transplantation of the Liver. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; (2015). p. 1354–63.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources