Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 15:5:1634602.
doi: 10.3389/fruro.2025.1634602. eCollection 2025.

Robot-assisted conversion of ureterocutaneous stoma to ileal conduit: a novel option for patients with post-cystectomy cutaneous diversion complicated by ureteral stricture and recurrent infections

Affiliations

Robot-assisted conversion of ureterocutaneous stoma to ileal conduit: a novel option for patients with post-cystectomy cutaneous diversion complicated by ureteral stricture and recurrent infections

Tengfei Gu et al. Front Urol. .

Abstract

Background: Radical cystectomy accompanied by urinary diversion remains the standard surgical intervention for individuals diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Notably, around 30% of these patients opt for a ureterocutaneous stoma. However, this technique is frequently associated with complications such as anastomotic stenosis, obstruction, and infection, which can lead to the deterioration of renal function and significantly impair the patient's quality of life. Consequently, this study investigates the safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic conversion from a ureterocutaneous stoma to an ileal conduit stoma, thereby offering a novel surgical alternative for patients undergoing total cystectomy with ureterocutaneous stoma.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out on two patients who underwent total cystectomy and ureterocutaneous stoma and were admitted to our hospital in January 2025. We performed robot-assisted laparoscopic conversion of the ureterocutaneous stoma to an ileal conduit for these patients and subsequently evaluated the clinical benefits and surgical safety associated with the procedure.

Result: Both patients successfully underwent surgery, with operation durations of 293 minutes and 281 minutes, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss was recorded at 100 ml and 50 ml, respectively. Abdominal drainage tubes were removed five days postoperatively, and both patients were discharged seven days following the procedure. No surgery-related complications were observed during the perioperative period. Ureteral stents were removed two months post-surgery. Post-extubation CT scans indicated a resolution of the initial mild hydronephrosis in the kidneys. Renal function assessments, including creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rate, demonstrated improvement compared to preoperative values. Additionally, patients reported lower pain scores and higher quality of life scores postoperatively compared to preoperative assessments.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureterocutaneostomy to ileal channel surgery is both feasible and safe, offering potential improvements in renal function and quality of life for patients. Additionally, it presents an alternative surgical option for those requiring ureterocutaneostomy.

Keywords: ileal channel stoma; robot-assisted; total cystectomy; ureterocutaneostomy; urinary diversion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Layout of puncture holes and cannulas.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Exploration of abdominal adhesion.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Separates the right ureter.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Separates the left ureter.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Marks the selected ileum.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Restoring the continuity of the intestinal tract.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Shows that the right ureter is anastomosed with.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Shows anastomosis between the left ureter and the lateral wall of the ileum the proximal ileum.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Resection of the stoma segment of the original ureteral cortex.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Re-ileostomy.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Hydronephrosis before surgery VS Hydronephrosis after surgery.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Hydronephrosis before surgery VS Hydronephrosis after surgery.

References

    1. van der Heijden AG, Bruins HM, Carrion A, Cathomas R, Compérat E, Dimitropoulos K, et al. European association of urology guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2025 guidelines. Eur Urol. (2025) 87:582–600. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.019, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Artibani W, Bochner B, Dalbagni G, Daneshmand S, et al. Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. BJU Int. (2014) 113:11–23. doi: 10.1111/bju.12121, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korkes F, Fernandes E, Gushiken FA, Glina FPA, Baccaglini W, Timóteo F, et al. Bricker ileal conduit vs. Cutaneous ureterostomy after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review. Int Braz J Urol. (2022) 48:18–30. doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0892, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Nunzio C, Cicione A, Izquierdo L, Lombardo R, Tema G, Lotrecchiano G, et al. Multicenter analysis of postoperative complications in octogenarians after radical cystectomy and ureterocutaneostomy: the role of the frailty index. Clin Genitourin Cancer. (2019) 17:402–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.002, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeong IG, Han KS, Joung JY, Seo HK, Chung J. The outcome with ureteric stents for managing non-urological Malignant ureteric obstruction. BJU Int. (2007) 100:1288–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07172.x, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources