Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1985 Oct 30;54(3):570-3.

Prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis by a combination of subcutaneous heparin with subcutaneous dihydroergotamine or oral sulphinpyrazone

  • PMID: 4089792
Clinical Trial

Prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis by a combination of subcutaneous heparin with subcutaneous dihydroergotamine or oral sulphinpyrazone

G Veth et al. Thromb Haemost. .

Abstract

In a randomized clinical trial the effect of subcutaneous heparin alone or in combination with dihydroergotamine or sulphinpyrazone in preventing postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was studied. Sodium heparin (5000 IU) was administered subcutaneously twice daily; dihydroergotamine (1/2 mg) was also administered subcutaneously twice daily, and sulphinpyrazone (400 mg) was administered orally or intravenously twice daily. Administration occurred for at least 7 days. The diagnosis DVT was made with the radiofibrinogen uptake test. 358 patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery were allocated to three treatment groups: heparin alone (Hep), heparin + dihydroergotamine (DHE-Hep) and heparin + sulphinpyrazone (Sulph-Hep). The frequency of DVT was 14/114 in Hep, 10/115 in DHE-Hep and 20/114 in Sulph-Hep. These differences were not significant. After application of the "logistic regression" procedure of Cox (1) it turned out that the major risk factors for developing DVT were age, sex, weight, type of operation and presence of diabetes mellitus. Also a significant treatment influence was observed (p = 0.001). This treatment effect was most probably due to improvement in the DHE-Hep group. The results in the Sulph-Hep group were not significantly different from those in the Hep group. A risk index was formulated on the basis of the above mentioned risk factors by which the chance of occurrence of DVT during heparin prophylaxis in an individual patient could be predicted. Patients that should receive additional prophylactic treatment can be defined by using this risk index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources