Action verbs and demonstrative pronouns affect volumetric affordance activation
- PMID: 40897929
- DOI: 10.3758/s13421-025-01783-0
Action verbs and demonstrative pronouns affect volumetric affordance activation
Abstract
Whereas the influence of visual information on the activation of perceived affordances is well documented, far less attention has been given to the specific role of language in modulating affordance activation. Furthermore, while several studies have demonstrated that nouns and verbs denoting grasping actions and graspable objects may potentiate affordances, there is little-to-no research exploring similar properties of other word classes, particularly those specifically marking spatial relations - the so-called demonstrative pronouns. Demonstratives (e.g., this, that) denote the object's position in space relative to the interlocutors (proximal or distal), therefore indicating its availability for action, which, in turn, predicts their potential involvement in modulating action affordances. To test this hypothesis, we used a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm with auditory stimuli to examine the impact of verbs and demonstratives on affordance activation. Participants were in a semantic judgement task presented with linguistic primes comprising a verb (action/observation) and a demonstrative (proximal/distal), followed by a target word denoting a manipulable object. First, our data confirmed the potential of action verbs to activate manual affordances, evident as expedited response times for object-verb congruent trials. Second, and most important, our data showed that proximal demonstratives had a similar capacity, particularly when paired with an action verb. These findings have significant implications for theories of language comprehension, supporting the view that language processing is deeply intertwined with sensorimotor systems and that demonstratives are integral components of spatial cognition, modulating the perceived affordances of objects.
Keywords: Demonstrative pronouns; Ecological psychology; Embodied cognition; Volumetric affordances.
© 2025. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest/Competing interests: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Ethics approval: This study received approval from the Anonymous University Committee for Interuniversity Surveys and Ethical Assessment of Empirical Research (Protocol No. 117, dated 27.11.2023). Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent for publication: All participants signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.
Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Short-Term Memory Impairment.2024 Jun 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Jun 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 31424720 Free Books & Documents.
-
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024. PMID: 38993656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial and social cognition jointly determine multimodal demonstrative reference: Experimental evidence from Turkish and Spanish.Cognition. 2025 Aug 21;266:106289. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106289. Online ahead of print. Cognition. 2025. PMID: 40845610
References
-
- Ambrosini, E., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & Costantini, M. (2012). Which body for embodied cognition? Affordance and language within actual and perceived reaching space. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1551–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONCOG.2012.06.010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Anelli, F., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2012). Grasping the pain: Motor resonance with dangerous affordances. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(4), 1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.09.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Annett, M. (1970). A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 61(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1970.tb01248.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Azaad, S., Laham, S. M., & Shields, P. (2019). A meta-analysis of the object-based compatibility effect. Cognition, 190, 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2019.04.028 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.PSYCH.59.103006.093639/CITE/REFWORKS - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources