Social Vulnerability as a Neighborhood-Level Determinant of Pancreatic Cancer Survivorship: A National Analysis of Veterans Affairs Patients
- PMID: 40897942
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-18232-6
Social Vulnerability as a Neighborhood-Level Determinant of Pancreatic Cancer Survivorship: A National Analysis of Veterans Affairs Patients
Abstract
Background: Veterans Affairs (VA) patients participate within the largest USA equal-access healthcare system, though still experience cancer mortality disparities by social determinants. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI)-measuring community poverty, minority status, housing, and transportation-has delineated gradients in cancer care utilization and outcomes. We therefore assessed relationships between SVI and mortality in veterans with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Patients and methods: Records of patients with stage I-III PDAC diagnosed January 2005-December 2018 were abstracted from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Addresses were geocoded to SVI. Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared tests compared baseline characteristics. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods.
Results: A total of 1778 patients were evaluated, of which 570 (32%) underwent surgical resection. A total of 516 (29%) patients originated from census tracts in the highest SVI quartile. These patients were more likely Black (38% vs 13%), unemployed (49% vs 35%), and metropolitan-based (87% vs 76%; all p < 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 8.7 months, median OS was 9.5 months versus 10.2 months for high and low SVI groups, respectively (log-rank p = 0.03). In the resected cohort, high and low SVI groups reflected a median OS of 18.2 months versus 23.1 months, respectively (log-rank p < 0.01). High SVI remained independently associated with mortality for resected patients only (hazard ratio [HR] 1.4, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: High SVI was associated with poorer prognosis after PDAC resection. Acknowledging a need to identify mechanisms, SVI has potential use in triaging PDAC survivorship interventions in veterans.
Keywords: Cancer; Geospatial; Pancreas; Social vulnerability; Veterans.
© 2025. Society of Surgical Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors of this study have no commercial interests to disclose. This research was not sponsored by any funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
-
- Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2018. Jhajjar: National Cancer Institute; 2021.
-
- Swords DS, Scaife CL. Decompositions of the contribution of treatment disparities to survival disparities in stage I–II pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(6):3157–68. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09267-y . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Alwatari Y, Mosquera CM, Khoraki J, et al. The impact of race/ethnicity on pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes for pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2023;127:99–108. - PubMed
-
- Makar M, Worple E, Dove J, et al. Disparities in care: impact of socioeconomic factors on pancreatic surgery: exploring the National Cancer Database. Am Surg. 2019;85(4):327–34. - PubMed
-
- Swords DS, Mulvihill SJ, Brooke BS, Stoddard GJ, Firpo MA, Scaife CL. County-level variation in use of surgery and cancer-specific survival for stage I–II pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2020;272(6):1102–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources