Social prescribing for informal carers: a pre-post study
- PMID: 40898024
- PMCID: PMC12403862
- DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02978-9
Social prescribing for informal carers: a pre-post study
Abstract
Background: Informal carers often experience compromised mental and physical wellbeing due to their caring responsibilities. While social prescribing shows promise in supporting various populations, evidence for its effectiveness in supporting carers is limited. This study assessed the impact of a social prescribing program on health-related quality of life and other wellbeing measures among Australian adult carers.
Methods: Analysis of de-identified data was conducted using pre- and post-intervention measures from two social prescribing programs in New South Wales, Australia (December 2021-August 2024). Participants were adults who self-presented or were referred by their GP for either mental ill-health or chronic disease management. Of 821 eligible participants, 93 (11.3%) were identified as carers based on their social prescriptions and case note review. The intervention involved link workers co-designing individualised plans with participants over 12 weeks, providing referrals to community services and supports. Outcomes included quality of life, mental wellbeing, self-reported health, psychological distress, and healthcare utilisation. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests for pre-post comparisons.
Results: Carers received significantly more social prescriptions than non-carers (mean difference = 2.05, p = .002), particularly in mental and emotional wellbeing (54%) and physical wellbeing (45%) domains. Following the intervention, carers showed significant improvements in quality of life (p < .001), mental wellbeing (p < .001), self-reported health (p < .001), and psychological distress (p < .001). GP visits reduced significantly (p = .002), while hospital visits showed non-significant reductions. Link workers primarily engaged with carers via phone (98%), followed by internet (80%) and face-to-face (67%) contact.
Conclusions: Social prescribing appears to be an effective intervention for supporting carers’ wellbeing and reducing healthcare utilisation. The high uptake of phone-based support suggests potential for scalable remote delivery. Future research with larger samples is needed to examine program benefits across diverse demographic groups and varying intensities of caring responsibilities.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-025-02978-9.
Keywords: Caregivers; Carers; Link worker; Quality of life; Social prescribing; Wellbeing.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethics approval and consent to participate: The present study was approved by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants signed informed consent on participation. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: JB and AT are employed by the organisation that delivers the social prescribing service evaluated in this study. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of efficacy and efficiency of a pragmatic intervention by a social worker to support informal caregivers of elderly patients (The ICE Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2016 Nov 3;17(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1622-8. Trials. 2016. PMID: 27881145 Free PMC article.
-
The Psychometric Performance of Generic Preference-Based Measures in Informal Carers: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies.Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Sep;43(9):1065-1082. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01509-9. Epub 2025 Jun 28. Pharmacoeconomics. 2025. PMID: 40580406 Free PMC article.
-
Social exclusion in adult informal carers: A systematic narrative review of the experiences of informal carers of people with dementia and mental illness.Maturitas. 2018 Jun;112:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 29. Maturitas. 2018. PMID: 29704916
-
The Experiences of Informal Carers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Systematic Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 18;19(20):13455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013455. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36294030 Free PMC article.
-
A study protocol for a pragmatic pre-post trial to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel co-designed service to support health and wellbeing of older carers of older people.PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0326363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326363. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40531926 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: Summary of Findings. 2022. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/disability/disability-ageing-an.... Cited 11 July 2024.
-
- Deloitte Australia. The value of informal care in 2020. 2021. Available from: https://www.deloitte.com/au/en/services/economics/perspectives/value-of-.... Cited 24 Oct 2024.
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Informal carers. 2023. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-welfare/informal-carers. Cited 20 Sept 2024.
-
- Carers Australia. Carers Australia. Available from: https://www.carersaustralia.com.au/. Cited 24 Oct 2024.
-
- Poon AWC, Hofstaetter L, Judd-Lam S. Social connectedness of carers: An Australian national survey of carers. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(6):e5612–23. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/. Cited 9 July 2024. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources