Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 2;10(1):42.
doi: 10.1186/s41256-025-00441-x.

Infrastructure-health nexus in Brazil: a scoping review

Affiliations

Infrastructure-health nexus in Brazil: a scoping review

Flavio Pinheiro Martins et al. Glob Health Res Policy. .

Abstract

Background: Health system development requires robust infrastructure systems support, particularly in countries with significant regional and socioeconomic disparities. Brazil's experience with its Unified Health System offers important insights into how the infrastructure and built environment is linked to health outcomes especially in underserved populations. This scoping review examines how different infrastructure systems such as sanitation, transportation, educational facilities, housing, influence population health in Brazil through two key pathways: (1) their role in shaping environmental conditions that affect health, and (2) their impact on healthcare service delivery among vulnerable populations.

Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR checklist, we conducted a systematic search of studies published between 2013-2024 across Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases. Search terms included infrastructure systems (sanitation, transportation, housing, educational facilities), health outcomes (universal health coverage, infectious diseases, maternal health), and population descriptors (vulnerable, indigenous, underserved) combined with Brazil-specific terms. Inclusion criteria focused on studies examining physical infrastructure's impact on health outcomes in underserved Brazilian communities, published in English or Portuguese. After applying exclusion criteria including publication year restrictions, language filters, geographic limitations, duplicate removal, and non-article format exclusions, 68 studies met inclusion criteria following screening and quality assessment using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Our analysis applied an infrastructure framework examining institutional, personal, and material infrastructure dimensions. Data extraction captured infrastructure systems, healthcare service tiers (primary, secondary, tertiary), and specific health outcomes. Synthesis involved thematic analysis to identify patterns in infrastructure-health relationships, revealing three interconnected dimensions that form the Infrastructure-Health Nexus framework.

Results: The study revealed three interconnected dimensions of infrastructure impact: Supporting Health & Wellbeing, Service Access and Delivery, and Community Engagement. This framework shows how sanitation, transportation, educational, housing, and waste management systems affect health outcomes, with underserved populations facing particular challenges. Healthcare workforce programs serve as interim solutions, with educational facilities simultaneously functioning as health hubs for service delivery and community engagement. The study highlights misalignment between infrastructure investment and UHC objectives.

Conclusions: The Infrastructure-Health Nexus framework, building on Buhr's complementarity concept, shows how infrastructure shapes health outcomes through pathways requiring integrated planning. While current research focuses predominantly on primary care aspects, Brazil's epidemiological transition calls for broader health system considerations, suggesting reconceptualization of infrastructure systems planning as integral to health system development.

Keywords: Brazil; Health infrastructure; Health system; Healthcare access; Population health; Public health policy; SUS; Scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Infrastructure Dimensions and their Relationship with Brazil’s Unified Health System. Legend Framework showing the three interconnected infrastructure dimensions (institutional, personal, and material) that support Brazil’s SUS operations and influence health outcomes. Source Developed by authors
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection process. Legend Systematic selection process following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, from initial search of 70,425 records across three databases to final inclusion of 68 studies after screening and quality assessment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Infrastructure-Health Nexus in Brazil. Legend Conceptual framework showing three interconnected dimensions: Supporting Health & Wellbeing, Healthcare Services Access and Delivery, and Community Engagement, and their influence on population health outcomes in Brazil. Source Developed by the authors

References

    1. World Health Organization, The World Bank. Tracking universal health coverage. global monitoring report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. p. 2023.
    1. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals: 3. Good health and well-being. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/; 2015 [accessed 12 October 2024].
    1. Massuda A, Dall’Alba R, Chioro A, Temporão JG, Castro MC. After a far-right government: challenges for Brazil’s unified health system. Lancet. 2023;401(10380):886–8. - PubMed
    1. OECD. Oecd reviews of health systems: Brazil 2021. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2021.
    1. Camargo KR Jr, Azevedo e Silva G, Giovanella L. Brazil’s national health care system at risk for losing its universal character. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(6):811–2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources