Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 3.
doi: 10.1007/s12975-025-01378-6. Online ahead of print.

How Do Patient Outcomes in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large-Core Stroke Vary Based on Neuroimaging Modalities Used for Patient Selection? A Multicenter Multinational Study

Affiliations

How Do Patient Outcomes in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large-Core Stroke Vary Based on Neuroimaging Modalities Used for Patient Selection? A Multicenter Multinational Study

Omar Alwakaa et al. Transl Stroke Res. .

Abstract

The role of different imaging modalities-non-contrast CT (NCCT), CT perfusion (CTP), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-in selecting patients with large-core stroke for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a subject of ongoing debate. This study aims to determine whether patients with large-core acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing EVT triaged with CTP or DWI in addition to NCCT had different clinical outcomes compared to those only triaged with NCCT. We queried the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) for patients enrolled between 2014 and 2023 who presented with anterior-circulation AIS and large ischemic core (ASPECTS < 6) who underwent EVT in 41 stroke centers in the USA, Europe, Asia, and South America. Patients were stratified by the imaging used before EVT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare balanced cohorts of patients with NCCT vs CTP and NCCT vs DWI. The primary outcome was a favorable 90-day functional status (mRS 0-3). Secondary outcomes included intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) rates, symptomatic ICH (sICH), and successful/complete recanalization, as determined by mTICI score. A total of 403 patients were included, 121 were selected with NCCT alone, 227 with CTP, and 55 with DWI. Before PSM, 90-day mRS 0-3, successful reperfusion mTICI ≥ 2B, and sICH rates were similar across the three imaging modalities. mTICI-2C or greater rates were highest in DWI (50.9%; p < 0.01), followed by NCCT (41.3%) and CTP (27.8%). Patients selected with CTP had the highest ICH incidence (44.1%; p < 0.01). After 1:1 PSM, 104 pairs of NCCT vs CTP and 36 pairs of NCCT vs DWI were compared. There were no significant differences in any procedural or functional outcome measure between the matched groups, including mTICI ≥ 2C recanalization, 90-day mRS 0-3, ICH rates, and sICH rates. In patients with anterior large-vessel occlusion AIS with low ASPECTS, we found that selecting patients for EVT based on NCCT or employing advanced imaging to elucidate collaterals, infarct volume, and ischemic penumbra does not alter procedural or patient outcomes. NCCT alone may be sufficient to select patients for EVT in this patient population, especially in settings with limited resources.

Keywords: Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography (ASPECT) score; Endovascular thrombectomy; Large-vessel occlusion; Propensity score matching; Stroke; Successful recanalization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Dr Ilko L Maier: speakers’honoraria from Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr Robert M Starke: RMS research is supported by the NREF, Joe Niekro Foundation, Brain Aneurysm Foundation, Bee Foundation, Department of Health Biomedical Research Grant (21K02AWD-007000) and by National Institute of Health (R01NS111119-01A1) and (UL1TR002736, KL2TR002737) through the Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute, from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. RMS has an unrestricted research grant from Medtronic and Balt and has consulting and teaching agreements with Penumbra, Abbott, Medtronic, Balt, InNeuroCo, Cerenovus, Naglreiter, Tonbridge, Von Medical, and Optimize Vascular. Dr Marios-Nikos Psychogios: Grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) for the DISTAL trial (33IC30_198783) and TECNO trial (32003B_204977), Grant from Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung for the DISTAL trial. Unrestricted Grants for the DISTAL trial from Stryker Neurovascular Inc., Phenox GmbH, Penumbra Inc. and Rapid Medical Inc., Sponsor-PI SPINNERS trial (Funded by a Siemens Healthineers AG Grant), Research agreement with Siemens Healthineers AG, Local PI for the ASSIST, EXCELLENT, TENSION, COATING, SURF and ESCAPE-NEXT trials. Speaker fees: Stryker Neurovascular Inc., Medtronic Inc., Penumbra Inc., Acandis GmbH, Phenox GmbH, Siemens Healthineers AG. Dr. S. Yoshimura: received lecture fee from Stryker, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, Kaneka Medics. Dr Hugo Cuellar: Consultant for Medtronic and Microvention. Dr Daniele G. Romano: Consultant for Penumbra, Balt, Microvention, Phenox. Dr Omar Tanweer: Consulting Agreements: Viz.AI, Inc., Penumbra, Inc, Balt, Inc, Stryker Inc, Imperative Inc. Proctor: Microvention Inc, Medtronic Inc. Educational/Research Grants: Q’apel Inc, Steinberg Foundation. Dr. Justin. Mascitelli: Bee Foundation, Joe Niekro Foundation, Mizuho. Stryker, Imperative Care Site. Dr. Charles Matouk: Consultant for Stryker, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, and Silk Road Medical. Speaker for Penumbra and Silk Road Medical. Contact PI for NIH Grant R21NS128641. Dr. Min S. Park: Consultant for Medtronic. Dr Michael R Levitt: Unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic and Stryker; consulting agreement with Medtronic, Aeaean Advisers, Metis Innovative, and Genomadix; equity interest in Proprio, Stroke Diagnostics, Apertur, Stereotaxis, Fluid Biomed, and Hyperion Surgical; editorial board of Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery; Data safety monitoring board of Arsenal Medical. Dr Waleed Brinjikji: Holds equity in Nested Knowledge, Superior Medical Editors, Piraeus Medical, Sonoris Medical, and MIVI Neurovascular. He receives royalties from Medtronic and Balloon Guide Catheter Technology. He receives consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Imperative Care, Microvention, MIVI Neurovascular, Cerenovus, Asahi, and Balt. He serves in a leadership or fiduciary role for MIVI Neurovascular, Marblehead Medical LLC, Interventional Neuroradiology (Editor in Chief), Piraeus Medical, and WFITN. Dr Richard Williamson: Consultant for Medtronic, Stryker, and Synaptive Medical. Dr. Pedro Navia: Consultant for Penumbra, Medtronic, Stryker, Cerenovus and Balt. Dr Peter Kan: Grants from the NIH (1U18EB029353-01) and unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic and Siemens. Consultant for Imperative Care and Stryker Neurovascular. Stock ownership in Vena Medical. Dr Shakeel A Chowdhry: Consultant and proctor for Medtronic and Microvention. Dr Mohammad Ezzeldin: Consultant for Viz.ai and Imperative care. Investments in Galaxy Therapeutics. Dr David J Altschul: Consultant for MicroVention, Stryker, and Cerenovus. Dr Ramesh Grandhi: Consultant for Balt Neurovascular, Cerenovus, Medtronic Neurovascular, Rapid Medical, and Stryker Neurovascular. Dr Alejandro M Spiotta: Consultant for Penumbra, Terumo, RapidAI, Cerenovus. Dr Ali Alaraj: Consultant for Cerenovus. Data Sharing Statement: The relevant anonymized patient-level data are available on reasonable request from the authors. Consent to Participate: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board. Following institutional guidelines, all protected health information was removed, and individual patient consent was not required in the analysis of the case series. Competing Interests: The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.

References

    1. Rennert RC, Wali AR, Steinberg JA, et al. Epidemiology, natural history, and clinical presentation of large vessel ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(suppl_1):S4–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz042 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Sweid A, Hammoud B, Ramesh S, et al. Acute ischaemic stroke interventions: large vessel occlusion and beyond. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020;5(1):80–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2019-000262 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dumas V, Martin K, Giraud C, et al. Functional outcome in low-ASPECTS (0–5) acute ischemic stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy: impact of laterality explored in a single-center study. Front Neurol. 2023;14: 1205256. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1205256 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Sarraj A, Hassan AE, Abraham MG, et al. Trial of endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(14):1259–71. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2214403 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raha O, Hall C, Malik A, et al. Advances in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke. BMJ Med. 2023;2(1): e000407. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000407 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources