Pharmacokinetic Bridging Between an Autoinjector and a Prefilled Syringe Following Subcutaneous Administration of Mirikizumab in Healthy Participants
- PMID: 40900263
- DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03335-z
Pharmacokinetic Bridging Between an Autoinjector and a Prefilled Syringe Following Subcutaneous Administration of Mirikizumab in Healthy Participants
Abstract
Introduction: Mirikizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Two phase 1, open-label, two-arm, randomized studies compared pharmacokinetics and safety of mirikizumab (200 mg, Study AMBW; 300 mg, Study AMBX) to establish bioequivalence. Mirikizumab was administered subcutaneously using an autoinjector or a prefilled syringe (PFS) as a single dose in healthy participants.
Methods: Participants (male and female) were randomized 1:1 to mirikizumab by a PFS (reference) and an autoinjector (test). Participants were sub-randomized (1:1:1) to one of three injection sites (abdomen, arm, thigh) and stratified into one of three weight groups. Primary endpoints were maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax), and area under concentration versus time curves (time zero to infinity [AUC0-∞]; time to last time point with measurable concentration [AUC0-tlast]). Secondary objectives were safety and immunogenicity.
Results: In Study AMBW, 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios (autoinjector to PFS) of geometric least squares mean values for Cmax, AUC0-∞, and AUC0-tlast were within prespecified bioequivalence limits (0.80-1.25). Similar results were observed in Study AMBX, after administration of mirikizumab 300 mg, with bioequivalence achieved for AUC0-tlast and AUC0-∞, while the upper bound of the 90% CI of the geometric least squares mean ratio for Cmax was slightly above the bioequivalence upper threshold. Overall safety of mirikizumab was similar between devices in both studies. Immunogenicity was similar overall in Study AMBW, but slightly higher (autoinjector versus PFS) in Study AMBX.
Conclusion: Mirikizumab administered by autoinjector or PFS was considered bioequivalent at the 200-mg UC maintenance dose and the 300-mg CD maintenance dose. Safety and immunogenicity profiles were comparable between autoinjector and PFS. Availability of an autoinjector option may be preferred by some patients and may help improve patient adherence to treatment.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04607733; NCT05069896.
Keywords: Autoinjector; Bioequivalence; Colitis; Crohn’s disease; Mirikizumab; Pharmacokinetics; Prefilled syringe; Ulcerative.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Xin Zhang, Yuki Otani, Christopher D. Payne, Nathan J. Morris, Laiyi Chua, Rodrigo Escobar, Sihe Wang, and Galen Shi are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. Ethical Approval: Both studies were conducted in accordance with the study protocols and with consensus ethics principles derived from international ethics guidelines, including the Declaration of Helsinki and Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences International Ethical Guidelines, International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, and applicable laws and regulations. The study protocols were approved by the institutional review boards at each study site. All participants entered into the study provided written informed consent. Ethical review boards were in place for both studies: the WCG Independent Review Board was the overall (“master”) ethics committee for Study AMBW, and the Salus Institutional Review Board was the overall (“master”) ethics committee for Study AMBX. Informed consent forms, required to provide details about why the research was being done and what it would involve, were approved by the respective review boards and provided to participants. Subsequent dated written informed consent was required by each participant before the participant could participate in the study. The informed consent forms also noted that study data which did not directly identify participants could be published.
References
-
- Anselmo AC, Gokarn Y, Mitragotri S. Non-invasive delivery strategies for biologics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:19–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2018.183 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wen YF, Ji P, Schrieber SJ, et al. Evaluation of truncated AUC as an alternative measure to assess pharmacokinetic comparability in bridging biologic-device using prefilled syringes and autoinjectors. J Clin Pharmacol. 2023;63:1417–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.2322 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Li Z, Easton R. Practical considerations in clinical strategy to support the development of injectable drug-device combination products for biologics. MAbs. 2018;10:18–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2017.1392424 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hu P, Wang J, Florian J, et al. Systematic review of device parameters and design of studies bridging biologic-device combination products using prefilled syringes and autoinjectors. AAPS J. 2020;22:52. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-020-0433-8 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Liu Y, Söderberg J, Chao J. Adherence to and persistence with adalimumab therapy among Swedish patients with Crohn’s disease. Pharmacy (Basel). 2022;10:87. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy10040087 . - DOI - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical