Probing mental representations of space through sketch mapping: a scoping review
- PMID: 40900296
- PMCID: PMC12408434
- DOI: 10.1186/s41235-025-00667-w
Probing mental representations of space through sketch mapping: a scoping review
Abstract
Cognitive maps are mental representations of space essential for guiding spatial behavior. To assess the properties of these cognitive maps, sketch mapping has been widely used as a research tool in spatial cognition research. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the methodologies and the cognitive processes concerning the externalization of cognitive maps through sketch mapping. Following the PRISMA-ScR checklist (Tricco et al. in Ann Intern Med 169(7):467-473, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 ), a comprehensive search from five electronic databases was performed with predefined combinations of keywords. Twenty-four articles were selected and analyzed, covering a wide range of methods: traditional pen-and-paper sketching (n = 18 studies); combination of pen-and-paper and digital sketching (n = 1); exclusively digital sketching (n = 4); and digital VR sketching (n = 1). With regard to the formation of cognitive maps in environmental scale spaces, studies employed either direct experience or virtual experience of unfamiliar environments, videos, maps, or retrieval from own memory. This review highlights the inherent conflict between sketch maps' advantages in capturing knowledge in less structured experimental protocols and researchers' need for structured quantification of their quality, as well as the underused diversity of media through which sketch maps can be produced for appropriate scenarios. We encourage researchers to (a) increase the precision in reporting the cognitive processes being investigated with sketch maps (e.g., short-term vs. long-term memory), (b) rely on established data analysis methods instead of developing custom measures for each study, and (c) consider alternative media beyond pen and paper when more suitable to the experimental context.
Keywords: Mental representation of space; Scoping review; Sketch map; Spatial cognition.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: We do not have any competing interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Albert, W. S., Reinitz, M. T., Beusmans, J. M., & Gopal, S. (1999). The role of attention in spatial learning during simulated route navigation. Environment and Planning A Economy and Space,31(8), 1459–1472. 10.1068/a311459
-
- Anacta, V. J. A., Wang, J., & Schwering, A. (2014). Routes to remember: Comparing verbal instructions and sketch maps. In J. Huerta, S. Schade, & C. Granell (Eds.), Connecting a digital Europe through location and place (pp. 311–322). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-03611-3_18
-
- Appleyard, D. (1970). Styles and methods of structuring a city. Environment and Behavior,2(1), 100–117. 10.1177/001391657000200106
-
- Bilda, Z., & Demirkan, H. (2003). An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media. Design Studies,24(1), 27–50. 10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00032-7
-
- Billinghurst, M., & Weghorst, S. (1995). The use of sketch maps to measure cognitive maps of virtual environments. Proceedings Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium,95, 40–47. 10.1109/VRAIS.1995.512478
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources