Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Oct 10;43(29):3209-3220.
doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-00272. Epub 2025 Sep 3.

Xevinapant or Placebo Plus Platinum-Based Chemoradiotherapy in Unresected Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (TrilynX): A Randomized, Phase III Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Xevinapant or Placebo Plus Platinum-Based Chemoradiotherapy in Unresected Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (TrilynX): A Randomized, Phase III Study

Jean Bourhis et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: TrilynX was a randomized, double-blind, phase III study evaluating the addition of xevinapant (an inhibitor of apoptosis proteins inhibitor) or placebo to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with unresected locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN).

Methods: Patients with unresected LA SCCHN (oropharynx [p16-negative only], hypopharynx, or larynx) were randomly assigned 1:1 to six cycles of oral xevinapant 200 mg/day or matched placebo (once daily on Days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) plus CRT for the first three cycles (cisplatin [100 mg/m2 once on Day 2 of every cycle] plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy [70 Gy; 35 fractions of 2 Gy/day, 5 days/week]). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) assessed by the blinded independent review committee. Progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and safety were secondary end points.

Results: Between September 20, 2020, and February 27, 2023, 730 patients were randomly assigned to xevinapant plus CRT (n = 364) or placebo plus CRT (n = 366). The median (95% CI) EFS was 19.4 months (14.5 to not estimable) with xevinapant and 33.1 months (21.0 to not estimable) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.67]; P = .9919). OS was worse in the xevinapant arm (HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.86]). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 320 (87.9%; xevinapant) and 286 (80.3%; placebo) patients; anemia (78 [21.4%] v 51 [14.3%]) and neutropenia (71 [19.5%] v 69 [19.4%]) were the most common. Serious TEAEs occurred in 194 (53.3%; xevinapant) and 129 (36.2%; placebo) patients. TEAEs leading to death occurred in 22 (6.0%; xevinapant) and 13 (3.7%; placebo) patients.

Conclusion: Xevinapant plus CRT did not improve EFS (EFS was shorter with xevinapant v placebo) and demonstrated an unfavorable safety profile versus placebo plus CRT in patients with unresected LA SCCHN.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04459715.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Patient disposition (CONSORT diagram). aTwo patients assigned to the placebo arm erroneously received xevinapant treatment because of error at the site and were therefore reassigned to the xevinapant arm for safety analyses. CRT, chemoradiotherapy; EFS, event-free survival.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
EFS in the intention-to-treat population: (A) Kaplan-Meier estimates of EFS by BIRC in the overall population and (B) forest plot of EFS in prespecified subgroups. BIRC, blinded independent review committee; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; EFS, event-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; NE, not estimable; NR, not reported; P, placebo; X, xevinapant.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Efficacy in the intention-to-treat population. (A) Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS by BIRC, (B) Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS, (C) Kaplan-Meier estimates of LRC, (D) competing risk analysis of locoregional failure, and (E) competing risk analysis of distant failure. BIRC, blinded independent review committee; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; HR, hazard ratio; LRC, locoregional control; NE, not estimable; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–263. - PubMed
    1. Psyrri A, Rampias T, Vermorken JB. The current and future impact of human papillomavirus on treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:2101–2115. - PubMed
    1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Head and neck cancer. v5. 2024
    1. Ang KK. Multidisciplinary management of locally advanced SCCHN: Optimizing treatment outcomes. Oncologist. 2008;13:899–910. - PubMed
    1. Machiels JP, René Leemans C, Golusinski W, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1462–1475. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data