Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov;207(5):1953-1961.
doi: 10.1111/bjh.70135. Epub 2025 Sep 3.

Monitoring of measurable residual disease by next-generation sequencing in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia

Affiliations

Monitoring of measurable residual disease by next-generation sequencing in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia

Augustin Boudry et al. Br J Haematol. 2025 Nov.

Abstract

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is a strong prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers promise but must distinguish true signal from background. We assessed MRD in 98 adult AML patients in first complete remission after intensive chemotherapy using a duplex unique molecular identifier (UMI)-based NGS capture panel. Error reduction analysis showed up to a 20-fold decrease in artefactual calls versus conventional sequencing. Linearity studies with serial dilutions confirmed accurate quantification down to 0.01% variant allele frequency. In this cohort, NGS-MRD positivity did not significantly affect overall survival (OS) or relapse-free survival (RFS) after one course of chemotherapy. However, NGS-MRD positivity >0.1%, excluding DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, was significantly associated with inferior outcomes after two courses (OS: hazard ratio [HR] = 3.04, p = 0.0173; RFS: HR = 2.83, p = 0.0097). Combining multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC-MRD) with NGS-MRD identified a double-positive subgroup with particularly poor outcomes after the first course (OS: HR = 7.98, p < 0.001; RFS: HR = 7.87, p < 0.001). These findings underscore that duplex UMI-based NGS is a sensitive, quantitative approach for MRD assessment in AML, offering prognostic information complementary to MFC-MRD.

Keywords: AML; MRD; NGS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Principle and performance of next‐generation sequencing‐measurable residual disease (NGS‐MRD) with duplex unique molecular identifier (UMI). (A) Overview of UMI and duplex UMI usage (A, B, C, D refer to simplex UMIs; ⍺, β, δ, ɣ, ζ, ϵ, θ, η refer to duplex UMIs). (B) Comparison of error rates across methods. R3 refers to the call in three replicates (C) Evaluation of artefactual calls.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mutational landscape and variant persistence in complete remission. (A) Oncoplot of baseline variants at AMLdiagnosis. (B) Variant allele frequencies plotted on a logarithmic scale for all detected mutations at MRD time points (post‐course 1 and post‐course 2) in AML patients in first CR. Each dot represents an individual mutation. Horizontal lines with crosshairs indicate the median VAF and interquartile ranges. AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; CR, complete remission; MRD, measurable residual disease; TMB, tumour mutational burden; VAF, variant allele frequency.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Outcomes of next‐generation sequencing‐measurable residual disease (NGS‐MRD) positivity after excluding DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1 and IDH1/2 (DTAI) variants. (A) Overall survival (OS) and relapse‐free survival (RFS) at post‐course 1 (PC1). (B) OS and RFS at post‐course 2 (PC2). (C) Combined impact of NGS‐MRD and multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC‐MRD) on OS and RFS at PC1. (D) Combined impact of NGS‐MRD and MFC‐MRD on OS and RFS at PC2.

References

    1. Yuan Y, Zhou L, Miyamoto T, Iwasaki H, Harakawa N, Hetherington CJ, et al. AML1‐ETO expression is directly involved in the development of acute myeloid leukemia in the presence of additional mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(18):10398–10403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Song X, Peng Y, Wang X, Chen Y, Jin L, Yang T, et al. Incidence, survival, and risk factors for adults with acute myeloid leukemia not otherwise specified and acute myeloid leukemia with recurrent genetic abnormalities: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database, 2001‐2013. Acta Haematol. 2018;139(2):115–127. - PubMed
    1. Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, Craddock C, DiNardo CD, Dombret H, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood. 2022;140(12):1345–1377. - PubMed
    1. Shallis RM, Wang R, Davidoff A, Ma X, Zeidan AM. Epidemiology of acute myeloid leukemia: recent progress and enduring challenges. Blood Rev. 2019;36:70–87. - PubMed
    1. Morita K, Wang F, Jahn K, Hu T, Tanaka T, Sasaki Y, et al. Clonal evolution of acute myeloid leukemia revealed by high‐throughput single‐cell genomics. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5327. - PMC - PubMed