Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 2;11(3):e70149.
doi: 10.1002/trc2.70149. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.

Donanemab immunogenicity in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease

Affiliations

Donanemab immunogenicity in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease

Garrett R Mullins et al. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). .

Abstract

Introduction: Donanemab is an immunoglobulin G1 antibody that targets an N-terminal truncated form of amyloid beta present in mature plaques. Treatment-emergent (TE) anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were quantified in donanemab-treated participants from two pivotal clinical trials, and effects of TE ADAs on donanemab pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety were assessed.

Methods: Data were pooled from the phase 2 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ (NCT03367403) and phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trials (NCT04437511). Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to donanemab (700 mg for the first three doses, 1400 mg thereafter) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks up to 72 weeks. TE ADA-evaluable participants had a non-missing baseline ADA result and ≥ 1 non-missing post-baseline ADA result. TE ADA incidence and effect of titer on pharmacokinetics, amyloid plaque reduction, clinical efficacy (measured by change from baseline of integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale [iADRS] score and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB]), and safety were assessed.

Results: Of 922 TE ADA-evaluable donanemab-treated participants, 56 (6.1%) had ADAs detected at baseline, and 812 (88.1%) were TE ADA positive. Donanemab clearance increased linearly with logarithm of ADA titer; however, titer did not affect maximum donanemab concentration. Amyloid plaque level was significantly reduced with donanemab versus placebo, irrespective of titer (P < 0.001 for all). No association was found between ADA presence or titer and donanemab efficacy by iADRS or CDR-SB. Eighty-four of 984 (8.5%) donanemab-treated participants and 4 of 999 (0.4%) placebo-treated participants reported infusion-related reactions (IRRs). All donanemab-treated participants reporting immediate IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study; however, 90.5% of TE ADA-positive participants did not experience IRRs.

Discussion: Most participants were TE ADA positive. TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not have clinically meaningful impact on plaque reduction or efficacy. While all participants reporting IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.

Highlights: In pivotal trials, most donanemab-treated participants were treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (TE ADA) positive.TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not impact plaque reduction/efficacy.All participants reporting infusion-related reactions (IRRs) developed ADAs at some point during the study.However, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; amyloid plaques; anti‐drug antibodies; donanemab; immunogenicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

G.R.M., P.A., I.G., J.B., L.C., J.A.Z., C.D.E., E.S.M.N., H.W., R.K., D.A.B., and J.R.S. are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly & Company, which funded this research. G.A. was an employee of Eli Lilly & Company at the time this research was completed. Author disclosures are available in the supporting information.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
ADA testing paradigm. ADA, anti‐drug antibody; CP, cut point; NAb, neutralizing anti‑drug antibody.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Proportional increases in the donanemab model estimated clearance were seen with ADA titer increase (A); participants maintained concentration above the median threshold associated with efficacy in the plaque reduction model (B). Colored shaded area, median, and 90% prediction intervals for concentration over treatment duration for each category; dotted line, median threshold of 15.2 µg/mL; gray shading, 95% confidence interval. ADA, anti‐drug antibody; LOCF, last observation carried forward.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Amyloid plaque level was significantly reduced in all ADA titer groups versus placebo **p < 0.001. ADA, anti‐drug antibodies; LS, least squares; MMRM, mixed model repeated measures; PET, positron emission tomography.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
No association was noted between ADA titer and adjusted change from baseline in iADRS score (A) or CDR‐SB score (B). *P < 0.02 versus placebo; **P < 0.01 versus placebo. ADA, anti‐drug antibody; CDR‐SB, Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes; iADRS, integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale; LS, least squares; MMRM, mixed model repeated measures; PET, positron emission tomography.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
IRRs on day of infusion by ADA titer. Lower represents titers < 1:5120, middle, 1:5120–1:20480, and upper, > 1:20480. ADA, anti‐drug antibody; IRR, infusion‐related reaction.

References

    1. Mintun MA, Lo AC, Evans CD, et al. Donanemab in early Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(18):1691–704. - PubMed
    1. Sims JR, Zimmer JA, Evans CD, et al. Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer disease: The TRAILBLAZER‐ALZ 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;330(6):512–527. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eli Lilly and Company . KISUNLA™ [package insert]. 2024.
    1. Carter PJ, Rajpal A. Designing antibodies as therapeutics. Cell. 2022;185(15):2789–805. - PubMed
    1. Vaisman‐Mentesh A, Gutierrez‐Gonzalez M, DeKosky BJ, Wine Y. The Molecular Mechanisms That Underlie the Immune Biology of Anti‐drug Antibody Formation Following Treatment With Monoclonal Antibodies. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1951. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources