Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 4:21925682251376321.
doi: 10.1177/21925682251376321. Online ahead of print.

Retrospective Analysis of Expansile Duraplasty as Surgical Adjunct After Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Madeline E Greil  1 , Emily R Hunt  2 , Abel Torres Espin  3   4   5 , Rajiv Saigal  5
Affiliations

Retrospective Analysis of Expansile Duraplasty as Surgical Adjunct After Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Madeline E Greil et al. Global Spine J. .

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective single-center review.ObjectivesAssess whether expansile duraplasty was associated with greater motor recovery in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) compared with bony decompression alone.MethodsRetrospective chart review was conducted for patients who underwent surgical stabilization and decompression for tSCI at a level-1 trauma center. Changes in motor scores were calculated and compared between patients who had expansile duraplasty and those who did not.ResultsWe studied 96 patients: 11 who underwent expansile duraplasty and 85 who did not. The average pre-operative motor scores for patients with duraplasty was 33.3 ± 22.5 compared to 49.0 ± 29.3 for non-duraplasty (P = 0.11). At hospital discharge the duraplasty group had an average motor score of 43.1 ± 26.3 with an average score of 52.9 ± 29.4 for the non-duraplasty group (P = 0.41). The average motor score at the time of inpatient rehabilitation discharge was 55.3 ± 28.6 for duraplasty and 60.1 ± 30.3 for non-duraplasty (P = 0.37). The change in motor score between baseline and hospital discharge was 9.8 ± 11.8 for duraplasty and 3.9 ± 11.4 for controls (P = 0.088). There was a higher change in motor score from baseline to inpatient rehabilitation discharge in the duraplasty group (20.3 ± 11.6 vs 11.1 ± 13.5 for controls, P = 0.034) even after adjusting for covariates through inverse probability weighting (P = 0.017). The duraplasty group did not have significantly more complications.ConclusionsPatients who underwent expansile duraplasty at the time of surgical stabilization and decompression for acute tSCI had greater motor improvement between preoperative evaluation and rehabilitation discharge than patients without duraplasty. This technique warrants further study in a multi-center, prospective study.

Keywords: decompression; expansile duraplasty; motor scores; spinal cord injury; spine trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: RS is a consultant for Spiderwort, Propio, and Globus. MG, ER, and ATE have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Surgical Technique for Expansile Duraplasty (A) Left: After Performing Laminectomies, the Dura Over the Injured Spinal Cord is Carefully Opened With a Midline, Linear Incision (B) Right: An Acellular, Expansile Patch is Sutured to the Surrounding Dura to Expand the Intrathecal Space
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Delta Motor Scores Over Two Recovery Periods (Preoperative to Hospital Discharge and to Inpatient Rehabilitation Discharge)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Global regional, national burden of spinal cord injury, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(11):1026-1047. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00287-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beattie MS. Inflammation and apoptosis: linked therapeutic targets in spinal cord injury. Trends Mol Med. 2004;10(12):580-583. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2004.10.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hulsebosch CE. Recent advances in pathophysiology and treatment of spinal cord injury. Adv Physiol Educ. 2002;26(1-4):238-255. doi: 10.1152/advan.00039.2002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Badhiwala JH, Ahuja CS, Fehlings MG. Time is spine: a review of translational advances in spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;30(1):1-18. doi: 10.3171/2018.9.Spine18682 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Casha S, Zygun D, McGowan MD, Bains I, Yong VW, Hurlbert RJ. Results of a phase II placebo-controlled randomized trial of minocycline in acute spinal cord injury. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 4):1224-1236. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws072 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources