Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 23;105(6):e213677.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213677. Epub 2025 Sep 4.

Cerebrovascular Reactivity at Rest and Its Association With Cognitive Function in People With Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia

Affiliations

Cerebrovascular Reactivity at Rest and Its Association With Cognitive Function in People With Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia

Ivana Kirilova Kancheva et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is an indicator of cerebrovascular health, and its signature in familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains unknown. The primary aim was to investigate CVR in genetic FTD using an fMRI index of vascular contractility termed resting-state fluctuation amplitudes (RSFAs) and to assess whether RSFA differences are moderated by age. A secondary aim was to study the relationship between RSFA and cognition.

Methods: Participants included presymptomatic and symptomatic C9orf72, GRN, and MAPT pathogenic variation carriers, along with noncarriers, from the prospective Genetic FTD Initiative cohort study. Cross-sectional differences in CVR were assessed using both component-based and voxel-level RSFA maps. To study disease progression-related effects, the moderating effect of age on differences between genetic status groups was analyzed using generalized linear models. The influence of RSFA, and its interaction with genetic status, on participants' cognitive function was also examined. All models were adjusted for sex, handedness, and scanning site and false discovery rate-corrected at p < 0.05.

Results: A total of 284 presymptomatic and 124 symptomatic sequence variation carriers, and 265 noncarriers, were included in the analysis (mean age 48.17 years, 55% female). Across the sample, symptomatic carriers exhibited lower RSFA and a greater age-related RSFA decline predominantly in the medial frontal (-0.07 standard units, p = 0.046, 95% CI -0.13 to -0.01) and posterior parietal (-0.06 standard units, p = 0.048, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.01) cortex, compared with presymptomatic carriers and noncarriers. RSFA was inversely correlated with age (-0.43 standard units, p < 0.001, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.37) and positively associated with cognitive function (0.09 standard units, p = 0.008, 95% CI 0.04-0.15), particularly in the prefrontal cortex, in sequence variation carriers across the sample, independent of disease stage.

Discussion: CVR impairment in genetic FTD has a predilection for the middle frontal and posterior cortex, and its preservation may yield a cognitive benefit for at-risk individuals. Although findings do not provide causality and warrant replication, they support the notion that vascular dysfunction in familial FTD may be a target for biomarker identification and disease-modifying efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.C. Van Swieten, L.C. Jiskoot, and H. Seelaar are supported by the Dioraphte Foundation grant 09-02-03-00, Association for Frontotemporal Dementias Research Grant 2009, Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research grant HCMI 056-13-018, ZonMw Memorabel (Deltaplan Dementie, project number 733 051 042), ZonMw Onderzoeksprogramma Dementie (YOD-INCLUDED, project number 10510032120002), EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research-GENFI-PROX, Alzheimer Nederland, and the Bluefield Project. R. Sánchez-Valle is supported by Alzheimer's Research UK Clinical Research Training Fellowship (ARUK-CRF2017B-2); and has received funding from Fundació Marató de TV3, Spain (grant 20143810). C. Graff received funding from EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research-Prefrontals Vetenskapsrådet Dnr 529-2014-7504, EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research-GENFI-PROX, Vetenskapsrådet 2019-0224, Vetenskapsrådet 2015-02926, Vetenskapsrådet 2018-02754, the Swedish FTD Initiative-Schörling Foundation, Alzheimer Foundation, Brain Foundation, Dementia Foundation, and Region Stockholm ALF-project. D. Galimberti received support from the EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research and the Italian Ministry of Health (PreFrontALS) grant 733051042. R. Vandenberghe has received funding from the Mady Browaeys Fund for Research into Frontotemporal Dementia. J. Levin received funding for this work by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft German Research Foundation under Germany's Excellence Strategy within the framework of the Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (EXC 2145 SyNergy-ID 390857198). M. Otto has received funding from Germany's Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). E. Finger has received funding from a Canadian Institute of Health Research grant #327387. M. Masellis has received funding from a Canadian Institute of Health Research operating grant and the Weston Brain Institute and Ontario Brain Institute. Several authors of this publication (J.C. Van Swieten, M. Synofzik, R. Sánchez-Valle, A. de Mendonça, M. Otto, R. Vandenberghe, J.D. Rohrer) are members of the European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND) (Project ID 739510). F. Moreno is supported by the Tau Consortium and has received funding from the Carlos III Health Institute (PI19/01637). J.D. Rohrer is supported by the Bluefield Project and the National Institute for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre; and has received funding from an MRC Clinician Scientist Fellowship (MR/M008525/1) and a Miriam Marks Brain Research UK Senior Fellowship. J.B. Rowe has received funding from the Wellcome Trust (103838; 220258) and is supported by the Cambridge University Centre for Frontotemporal Dementia, the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00030/14; MR/T033371/1), and the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312: BRC-1215-20014), and the Holt Fellowship. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. J.B. Rowe is a nonremunerated trustee of the Guarantors of Brain and Darwin College; provides consultancy, unrelated to the current work, to Alzheimer Research UK, Asceneuron, Astronautx, Alector, CuraSen, CumulusNeuro, ClinicalInk, SV Health, and Wave; and has research grants from AZ-Medimmune, Janssen, and Lilly, as industry partners in the Dementias Platform UK. K. Tsvetanov was supported by Fellowship awards from the Guarantors of Brain (G101149) and Alzheimer's Society, UK (grant number 602). All other authors report no relevant disclosures. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Neurocognitively Meaningful Independent Components Based on Spatial ICA on RSFA Maps
Spatial distribution of 4 ICs within neurocognitively meaningful areas (i.e., GM regions) based on spatial ICA on RSFA maps across participants, where differences in IC loading values are found in association with genetic status, age, and genetic status × age interaction. Robust general linear model regression lines for each IC are presented in scatter plots with respective r values on the right side of each IC map. p Values are FDR-corrected at the 0.05 level across the whole sample. Group-level spatial maps are overlaid onto the Colin-27 (ch2.nii) structural template of the MNI brain, where intensity values correspond to z-values. FDR = false discovery rate; GM = gray matter; IC = independent component; ICA = IC analysis; MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute; RSFA = resting-state fluctuation amplitudes.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Differences in Global Cognitive Function in Association With Genetic Status, RSFA, and Genetic Status × RSFA Interaction Across Groups of Interest
Cognitive function is denoted by participants' loading values for PC 1 after PCA on 9 cognitive measures. Effects are illustrated for ICA-based components within GM areas (A) and several representative ROIs based on TFCE-corrected voxel-wise univariate analysis (B). Robust general linear model regression lines for each respective IC and ROI are presented in scatter plots with corresponding r values on the right side of a representative slice depicting each IC/ROI map. p Values are FDR-corrected at the 0.05 level across the whole sample. FDR = false discovery rate; GM = gray matter; IC = independent component; ICA = IC analysis; MFG = middle frontal gyrus; PC = principal component; PCA = PC analysis; PCC = posterior cingulate cortex; ROI = region of interest; RSFA = resting-state fluctuation amplitudes; TFCE = threshold-free cluster enhancement.
Figure 3
Figure 3. RSFA Effects Based on Voxel-Wise Univariate Analysis
(A) Regional distribution of RSFA effects based on voxel-level univariate analysis. Cold colors denote RSFA decreases as a function of genetic status and their interaction with age. Statistical parametric maps are displayed at an uncorrected level of p < 0.01 to better visualize regional CVR patterns. Images are overlaid onto the Colin-27 (ch2.nii) structural template of the MNI brain. (B) Differences in RSFA in association with genetic status, age, and genetic status × age interaction across groups of interest in several representative ROIs based on TFCE-corrected voxel-wise univariate analysis on RSFA maps. Robust general linear model regression lines for each ROI are presented in scatter plots with respective r values on the right side of each ROI map. p Values are FDR-corrected at the 0.05 level across the whole sample. CVR = cerebrovascular reactivity; FDR = false discovery rate; MFG = middle frontal gyrus; MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute; NC = noncarrier; PCC = posterior cingulate cortex; PSC = presymptomatic carrier; ROI = region of interest; RSFA = resting-state fluctuation amplitudes; SC = symptomatic carrier of a sequence variation; TFCE = threshold-free cluster enhancement.

References

    1. Greaves CV, Rohrer JD. An update on genetic frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol. 2019;266(8):2075-2086. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09363-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cash DM, Bocchetta M, Thomas DL, et al. Patterns of gray matter atrophy in genetic frontotemporal dementia: results from the GENFI study. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;62:191-196. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.10.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mutsaerts HJ, Mirza SS, Petr J, et al. Cerebral perfusion changes in presymptomatic genetic frontotemporal dementia: a GENFI study. Brain. 2019;142(4):1108-1120. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz039 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dopper EG, Chalos V, Ghariq E, et al. Cerebral blood flow in presymptomatic MAPT and GRN mutation carriers: a longitudinal arterial spin labeling study. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;12:460-465. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.08.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerrits E, Giannini LA, Brouwer N, et al. Neurovascular dysfunction in GRN-associated frontotemporal dementia identified by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of human cerebral cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25(8):1034-1048. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01124-3 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms