Exploring Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of the Facilitators and Barriers to Patient Engagement in Research: Participatory Qualitative Study
- PMID: 41027038
- PMCID: PMC12483476
- DOI: 10.2196/79538
Exploring Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of the Facilitators and Barriers to Patient Engagement in Research: Participatory Qualitative Study
Abstract
Background: Patient engagement in research is the meaningful and active involvement of patient and caregiver partners (ie, patients and their family or friends) in research priority-setting, conduct, and governance. With the proper support, patient and caregiver partners can inform every stage of the research cycle, but common barriers often prevent their full engagement.
Objective: This participatory qualitative study aimed to answer the question: What are the facilitators and barriers to patient engagement experienced by patient and caregiver partners in a Canadian research context?
Methods: Participants were N=13 patient and caregiver partners (median age 62 y, IQR 58-69 y; 11/13, 85% women; 13/13, 100% White) from 4 provinces who completed 60-90-minute semistructured videoconferencing interviews. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. A researcher and a patient partner reviewed the transcripts and curated a dataset of 90 participant quotations representing facilitators and barriers to patient engagement. This dataset was co-analyzed using participatory theme elicitation alongside 7 patient and caregiver partners with diverse identities who were not among the participants we interviewed and, therefore, contributed novel perspectives.
Results: We generated four themes depicting factors that facilitate meaningful patient engagement alongside barriers that arise when these factors are not in place: (1) Co-defining roles and expectations; (2) demonstrating the value and impact of engagement; (3) psychological safety; and (4) community outreach, training, and education. We then discuss how barriers to enacting these 4 factors can be mitigated and provide a practical checklist of considerations for both researchers and patient and caregiver partners for engaging together throughout the research cycle.
Conclusions: Research teams conducting patient and caregiver engagement activities should draw from our findings to mitigate barriers and facilitate meaningful engagement experiences.
Keywords: co-analysis; participatory research; patient partnership; patient-oriented research; public and patient engagement.
© Sasha Melanda Kullman, Louise Bird, Amy Clark, Amanda Doherty-Kirby, Diana Ermel, Nathalie Kinnard, Marion Knutson, Andrew Milroy, Lesley Singer, Anna Maria Chudyk. Originally published in Journal of Participatory Medicine (https://jopm.jmir.org).
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Strategy for patient-oriented research – patient engagement framework. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 2019. [19-09-2025]. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html URL. Accessed.
-
- UK standards for public involvement. National Institute for Health Research. 2019. [19-09-2025]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U-IJNJCfFepaAOruEhzz1TdLvAcHTt2Q/view?p... URL. Accessed.
-
- Australian clinical trials alliance. Toolkit for researchers and research organizations. 2025. [19-09-2025]. https://involvementtoolkit.clinicaltrialsalliance.org.au/toolkit URL. Accessed.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
