Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 30:17:e79538.
doi: 10.2196/79538.

Exploring Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of the Facilitators and Barriers to Patient Engagement in Research: Participatory Qualitative Study

Affiliations

Exploring Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of the Facilitators and Barriers to Patient Engagement in Research: Participatory Qualitative Study

Sasha Melanda Kullman et al. J Particip Med. .

Abstract

Background: Patient engagement in research is the meaningful and active involvement of patient and caregiver partners (ie, patients and their family or friends) in research priority-setting, conduct, and governance. With the proper support, patient and caregiver partners can inform every stage of the research cycle, but common barriers often prevent their full engagement.

Objective: This participatory qualitative study aimed to answer the question: What are the facilitators and barriers to patient engagement experienced by patient and caregiver partners in a Canadian research context?

Methods: Participants were N=13 patient and caregiver partners (median age 62 y, IQR 58-69 y; 11/13, 85% women; 13/13, 100% White) from 4 provinces who completed 60-90-minute semistructured videoconferencing interviews. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. A researcher and a patient partner reviewed the transcripts and curated a dataset of 90 participant quotations representing facilitators and barriers to patient engagement. This dataset was co-analyzed using participatory theme elicitation alongside 7 patient and caregiver partners with diverse identities who were not among the participants we interviewed and, therefore, contributed novel perspectives.

Results: We generated four themes depicting factors that facilitate meaningful patient engagement alongside barriers that arise when these factors are not in place: (1) Co-defining roles and expectations; (2) demonstrating the value and impact of engagement; (3) psychological safety; and (4) community outreach, training, and education. We then discuss how barriers to enacting these 4 factors can be mitigated and provide a practical checklist of considerations for both researchers and patient and caregiver partners for engaging together throughout the research cycle.

Conclusions: Research teams conducting patient and caregiver engagement activities should draw from our findings to mitigate barriers and facilitate meaningful engagement experiences.

Keywords: co-analysis; participatory research; patient partnership; patient-oriented research; public and patient engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Patient-caregiver partner engagement throughout the research process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Summary of thematic results.

References

    1. Strategy for patient-oriented research – patient engagement framework. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 2019. [19-09-2025]. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html URL. Accessed.
    1. UK standards for public involvement. National Institute for Health Research. 2019. [19-09-2025]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U-IJNJCfFepaAOruEhzz1TdLvAcHTt2Q/view?p... URL. Accessed.
    1. Australian clinical trials alliance. Toolkit for researchers and research organizations. 2025. [19-09-2025]. https://involvementtoolkit.clinicaltrialsalliance.org.au/toolkit URL. Accessed.
    1. Aiyegbusi OL, McMullan C, Hughes SE, et al. Considerations for patient and public involvement and engagement in health research. Nat Med. 2023 Aug;29(8):1922–1929. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02445-x. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bailey K, Allemang B, Vandermorris A, et al. Benefits, barriers and recommendations for youth engagement in health research: combining evidence-based and youth perspectives. Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 2;10(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00607-w. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources